Industrias Peñoles, S.A.B. de C.V.
Industrias Peñoles, S.A.B. de C.V. (IPOAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPOAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOAF | $29.40 | -8.10% | 12.4B | 41.70 | $0.75 | N/A |
| WYCC | $0.00 | +0.00% | 438.8B | -1.46 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| CHZQ | $0.00 | -0.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $27.99 | +13.09% | 127.3B | 11.19 | $2.24 | +4.95% |
| RTNTF | $71.00 | -4.63% | 105.4B | 11.90 | $6.28 | +3.14% |
| RTPPF | $59.96 | -1.49% | 104.8B | 9.82 | $6.28 | +6.52% |
| CYLYF | $0.00 | -99.99% | 66B | -1.05 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GMBXF | $6.38 | -4.20% | 51.1B | 13.12 | $0.50 | +3.67% |
| GLNCY | $7.54 | -2.58% | 46.5B | -24.48 | -$0.32 | +2.75% |
| GLCNF | $3.80 | -1.65% | 46.3B | -24.37 | -$0.16 | +2.95% |
Stock Comparison
IPOAF vs WYCC Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 438.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while WYCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check WYCC's competition here
IPOAF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CHZQ's competition here
IPOAF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BHPLF trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BHPLF's competition here
IPOAF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while RTNTF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check RTNTF's competition here
IPOAF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while RTPPF trades at $59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check RTPPF's competition here
IPOAF vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CYLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CYLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CYLYF's competition here
IPOAF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while GMBXF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check GMBXF's competition here
IPOAF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while GLNCY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.48. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check GLNCY's competition here
IPOAF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while GLCNF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.37. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check GLCNF's competition here
IPOAF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while FSUGY trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check FSUGY's competition here
IPOAF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while FSUMF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check FSUMF's competition here
IPOAF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AAUKF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AAUKF's competition here
IPOAF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while NGLOY trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check NGLOY's competition here
IPOAF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CMCLF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CMCLF's competition here
IPOAF vs CNSUF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CNSUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CNSUF's competition here
IPOAF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 99.39. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check TCKRF's competition here
IPOAF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check JXMNF's competition here
IPOAF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while IVPAF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check IVPAF's competition here
IPOAF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BOLIF's competition here
IPOAF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BDNNY trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BDNNY's competition here
IPOAF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while SHTLF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check SHTLF's competition here
IPOAF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while LYSDY trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 212.25. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check LYSDY's competition here
IPOAF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while LYSCF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 281.67. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check LYSCF's competition here
IPOAF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while SMMYY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check SMMYY's competition here
IPOAF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ABML's competition here
IPOAF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check STMNF's competition here
IPOAF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PUTKY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PUTKY's competition here
IPOAF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PUTKF's competition here
IPOAF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PILBF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -148.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PILBF's competition here
IPOAF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MALRY trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MALRY's competition here
IPOAF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check NILSY's competition here
IPOAF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PAEKY's competition here
IPOAF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while NGXXF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -56.43. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check NGXXF's competition here
IPOAF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check FLMMF's competition here
IPOAF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check IPGDF's competition here
IPOAF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check IIDDY's competition here
IPOAF vs ARDNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ARDNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ARDNF's competition here
IPOAF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AFBOF's competition here
IPOAF vs PWCRF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PWCRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PWCRF's competition here
IPOAF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PTNDY's competition here
IPOAF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check NICMF's competition here
IPOAF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MIMTF's competition here
IPOAF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check DWMNF's competition here
IPOAF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PTNDF's competition here
IPOAF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AZZVF's competition here
IPOAF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ILKAY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ILKAY's competition here
IPOAF vs RTRFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while RTRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check RTRFF's competition here
IPOAF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MALRF's competition here
IPOAF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while SOUHY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check SOUHY's competition here
IPOAF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ERMAY trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ERMAY's competition here
IPOAF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ERMAF's competition here
IPOAF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ILKAF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ILKAF's competition here
IPOAF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while LINRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check LINRF's competition here
IPOAF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check DETRF's competition here
IPOAF vs CXXMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CXXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CXXMF's competition here
IPOAF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ADTLF's competition here
IPOAF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ADMLF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ADMLF's competition here
IPOAF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -13.52. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check TAOFF's competition here
IPOAF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check NCKAF's competition here
IPOAF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AZRMF's competition here
IPOAF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AUSDF's competition here
IPOAF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MFRVF's competition here
IPOAF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check STTSY's competition here
IPOAF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while FMCXF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.40. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check FMCXF's competition here
IPOAF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ATUSF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ATUSF's competition here
IPOAF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 997.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AFMJF's competition here
IPOAF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check TTNNF's competition here
IPOAF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 916.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while AMVMF trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check AMVMF's competition here
IPOAF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check OSTTF's competition here
IPOAF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ALMTF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ALMTF's competition here
IPOAF vs GERFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 831.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check GERFF's competition here
IPOAF vs BAJFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BAJFF has a market cap of 794.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BAJFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BAJFF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAJFF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BAJFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BAJFF's competition here
IPOAF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 776M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PXMFF's competition here
IPOAF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 730.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CREQF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -26.18. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CREQF's competition here
IPOAF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BIRNF's competition here
IPOAF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 639M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while REEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -41.27. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check REEMF's competition here
IPOAF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 609.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while VULNF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check VULNF's competition here
IPOAF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while SLGGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.65. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check SLGGF's competition here
IPOAF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 544.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MJDLF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MJDLF's competition here
IPOAF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while PMETF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -108.33. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check PMETF's competition here
IPOAF vs BLNMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BLNMF has a market cap of 508M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BLNMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BLNMF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLNMF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BLNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BLNMF's competition here
IPOAF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 500M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BQSSF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BQSSF's competition here
IPOAF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 496M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -93.77. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check FGOVF's competition here
IPOAF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MCRZF's competition here
IPOAF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 450.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MNXMF's competition here
IPOAF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MCHHF's competition here
IPOAF vs VTMLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while VTMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check VTMLF's competition here
IPOAF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 408.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CGMLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CGMLF's competition here
IPOAF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check NQMIY's competition here
IPOAF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while KMRPF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check KMRPF's competition here
IPOAF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MLYF's competition here
IPOAF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 356.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while FWEDF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check FWEDF's competition here
IPOAF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ARAFF's competition here
IPOAF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check CTJHY's competition here
IPOAF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check MLXEF's competition here
IPOAF vs BELMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 337.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BELMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BELMF's competition here
IPOAF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while SVMLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check SVMLF's competition here
IPOAF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 311.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while ERLFF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.06. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check ERLFF's competition here
IPOAF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $29.40, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.70, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.Check BSSMF's competition here