IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITP | $0.20 | -3.94% | 3.3M | -0.20 | -$0.96 | N/A |
| SUZ | $9.31 | +0.43% | 11.5B | -77.58 | -$0.12 | +2.90% |
| LPX | $90.48 | +0.08% | 6.3B | 15.84 | $5.71 | +1.20% |
| UFPI | $97.73 | -0.28% | 5.9B | 16.96 | $5.76 | +1.39% |
| WFG | $69.80 | +0.71% | 5.3B | -43.35 | -$1.61 | +1.83% |
| SLVM | $45.25 | -1.78% | 1.8B | 6.64 | $6.81 | +3.98% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| CLW | $22.25 | -1.37% | 358.3M | -11.53 | -$1.93 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.26 | -5.44% | 342.8M | -0.77 | -$8.20 | +6.34% |
Stock Comparison
ITP vs SUZ Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while SUZ trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -77.58. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SUZ's competition here
ITP vs LPX Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while LPX trades at $90.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check LPX's competition here
ITP vs UFPI Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while UFPI trades at $97.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check UFPI's competition here
ITP vs WFG Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while WFG trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -43.35. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check WFG's competition here
ITP vs SLVM Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while SLVM trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SLVM's competition here
ITP vs RFP Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check RFP's competition here
ITP vs SWM Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SWM's competition here
ITP vs CLW Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 358.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while CLW trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check CLW's competition here
ITP vs MATV Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while MATV trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check MATV's competition here
ITP vs MERC Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while MERC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check MERC's competition here
ITP vs GLT Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check GLT's competition here
ITP vs EVA Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check EVA's competition here
ITP vs NWGL Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while NWGL trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check NWGL's competition here
ITP vs JCTCF Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check JCTCF's competition here
ITP vs JCTC Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while JCTC trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check JCTC's competition here
ITP vs NP Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check NP's competition here
ITP vs UFS Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check UFS's competition here
ITP vs VRS Comparison August 2025
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check VRS's competition here