Kelly Services, Inc.
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KELYB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KELYB | $12.94 | -2.56% | 486.4M | -24.32 | -$0.57 | +2.25% |
| ADP | $308.63 | +0.78% | 125.3B | 31.59 | $9.77 | +1.95% |
| PAYX | $147.99 | +1.09% | 53.3B | 32.31 | $4.58 | +2.79% |
| BZ | $20.05 | -0.25% | 4.5B | 35.18 | $0.57 | N/A |
| RHI | $39.81 | -0.08% | 4.1B | 22.75 | $1.75 | +5.62% |
| KFY | $73.71 | +0.23% | 3.8B | 16.03 | $4.60 | +2.31% |
| TNET | $68.83 | +4.73% | 3.3B | 20.46 | $3.36 | +1.52% |
| NSP | $60.37 | +1.56% | 2.3B | 35.69 | $1.69 | +3.96% |
| MAN | $45.70 | +2.10% | 2.1B | -126.97 | -$0.36 | +4.96% |
| UPWK | $13.11 | -0.91% | 1.7B | 7.90 | $1.66 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KELYB vs ADP Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while ADP trades at $308.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check ADP's competition here
KELYB vs PAYX Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while PAYX trades at $147.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check PAYX's competition here
KELYB vs BZ Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while BZ trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BZ's competition here
KELYB vs RHI Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while RHI trades at $39.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RHI's competition here
KELYB vs KFY Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while KFY trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KFY's competition here
KELYB vs TNET Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while TNET trades at $68.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TNET's competition here
KELYB vs NSP Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while NSP trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NSP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NSP's competition here
KELYB vs MAN Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while MAN trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is -126.97. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check MAN's competition here
KELYB vs UPWK Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while UPWK trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check UPWK's competition here
KELYB vs BBSI Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while BBSI trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BBSI's competition here
KELYB vs HRT Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HRT's competition here
KELYB vs HSII Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while HSII trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 128.56. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HSII's competition here
KELYB vs KFRC Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 865.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while KFRC trades at $46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KFRC's competition here
KELYB vs HHR Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HHR's competition here
KELYB vs KELYA Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 471.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while KELYA trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KELYA's competition here
KELYB vs ZIP Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 425M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while ZIP trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -24.08. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZIP's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check ZIP's competition here
KELYB vs TBI Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while TBI trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TBI's competition here
KELYB vs HQI Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while HQI trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HQI's competition here
KELYB vs DHX Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while DHX trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check DHX's competition here
KELYB vs VOLT Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, VOLT has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while VOLT trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas VOLT's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VOLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to VOLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check VOLT's competition here
KELYB vs MHH Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while MHH trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 45.94. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check MHH's competition here
KELYB vs BGSF Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while BGSF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -21.22. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BGSF's competition here
KELYB vs NIXX Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while NIXX trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NIXX's competition here
KELYB vs NIXXW Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while NIXXW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and NIXXW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIXXW's competition here
KELYB vs HSON Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while HSON trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HSON's competition here
KELYB vs JOB Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while JOB trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check JOB's competition here
KELYB vs GLXG Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while GLXG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLXG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check GLXG's competition here
KELYB vs EPWK Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while EPWK trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check EPWK's competition here
KELYB vs RCRT Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -34.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RCRT's competition here
KELYB vs CLIK Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while CLIK trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check CLIK's competition here
KELYB vs IPDN Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while IPDN trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check IPDN's competition here
KELYB vs PIXY Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check PIXY's competition here
KELYB vs STAF Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while STAF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STAF's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and STAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STAF's competition here
KELYB vs RCRTW Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RCRTW's competition here
KELYB vs JOBS Comparison July 2025
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 486.4M. In comparison, JOBS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $12.94, while JOBS trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -24.32, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check JOBS's competition here