Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS Peers
See (KGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGS | $37.01 | +1.56% | 3.3B | 74.02 | $0.50 | +4.52% |
| SLB | $33.86 | +2.34% | 46B | 11.48 | $2.95 | +3.31% |
| BKR | $37.90 | +2.02% | 37.5B | 12.94 | $2.93 | +2.32% |
| TS | $34.64 | +0.23% | 18.6B | 10.56 | $3.28 | +4.78% |
| HAL | $20.50 | +2.73% | 17.6B | 8.58 | $2.39 | +3.31% |
| FTI | $32.52 | +2.30% | 13.6B | 17.20 | $1.89 | +0.61% |
| CHX | $24.85 | +2.26% | 4.8B | 16.46 | $1.51 | +1.53% |
| NOV | $12.62 | +2.79% | 4.7B | 8.47 | $1.49 | +4.03% |
| AROC | $26.42 | +3.00% | 4.7B | 22.20 | $1.19 | +2.72% |
| WFRD | $48.37 | +3.29% | 3.5B | 7.70 | $6.28 | +2.06% |
Stock Comparison
KGS vs SLB Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while SLB trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs BKR Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while BKR trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs TS Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while TS trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs HAL Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while HAL trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs FTI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while FTI trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs CHX Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while CHX trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NOV Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NOV trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs AROC Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while AROC trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs WFRD Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while WFRD trades at $48.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs WHD Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while WHD trades at $45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs USAC Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while USAC trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs VAL Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while VAL trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs VAL-WT Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while VAL-WT trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs TDW-WT Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NEX Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs TDW Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while TDW trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs OII Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while OII trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs SEI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while SEI trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 61.27. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs LBRT Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while LBRT trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs LB Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while LB trades at $73.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -25.30. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs AESI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while AESI trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs DNOW Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while DNOW trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs ACDC Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while ACDC trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs SLCA Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs PFHC Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs MRC Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while MRC trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs INVX Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while INVX trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs RES Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while RES trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs XPRO Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while XPRO trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs HLX Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while HLX trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs EFXT Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 934.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while EFXT trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs WTTR Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 920.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while WTTR trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs VTOL Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while VTOL trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NPKI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 711.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NPKI trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NR Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs PUMP Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 618.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while PUMP trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NESR Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 597.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NESR trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NESRW Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 569.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NESRW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs DRQ Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NOA Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NOA trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs CLB Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while CLB trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs SOI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs FLOC Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while FLOC trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs FTK Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while FTK trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs TTI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 395.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while TTI trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs CCLP Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NGS Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 315.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NGS trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs OIS Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while OIS trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 57.69. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs RNGR Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while RNGR trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs FET Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while FET trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs BOOM Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while BOOM trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs PFIE Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs DTI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while DTI trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -43.14. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs LSE Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while LSE trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs GEOS Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while GEOS trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs SND Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while SND trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NCSM Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NCSM trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs RCON Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while RCON trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs DWSN Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while DWSN trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs KLXE Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while KLXE trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs SDPI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs NINE Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while NINE trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs ENSV Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 814.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while ENSV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs FTSI Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs USWS Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs IO Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs EXTN Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs CELP Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.
KGS vs ACDCW Comparison
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $37.01, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.02, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.