The Coca-Cola Company
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO | $68.75 | -0.91% | 295.9B | 24.38 | $2.82 | +2.89% |
| PEP | $142.86 | -0.72% | 195.6B | 26.02 | $5.49 | +3.84% |
| MNST | $61.04 | -0.56% | 59.5B | 40.16 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KDP | $33.82 | -0.09% | 45.9B | 29.93 | $1.13 | +2.70% |
| CCEP | $99.25 | +0.00% | 45.7B | 27.42 | $3.62 | +2.23% |
| KOF | $83.43 | +0.25% | 17.5B | 13.75 | $6.06 | +3.83% |
| CELH | $46.54 | -1.90% | 12B | 141.03 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $27.98 | -0.96% | 10.5B | -254.45 | -$0.11 | +4.26% |
| COKE | $114.65 | -0.11% | 10B | 17.06 | $6.72 | +0.87% |
| FIZZ | $46.72 | -0.57% | 4.4B | 23.48 | $1.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KO vs PEP Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 195.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while PEP trades at $142.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check PEP's competition here
KO vs MNST Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while MNST trades at $61.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check MNST's competition here
KO vs KDP Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while KDP trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check KDP's competition here
KO vs CCEP Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while CCEP trades at $99.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check CCEP's competition here
KO vs KOF Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while KOF trades at $83.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check KOF's competition here
KO vs CELH Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while CELH trades at $46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 141.03. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check CELH's competition here
KO vs PRMB Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while PRMB trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -254.45. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check PRMB's competition here
KO vs COKE Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while COKE trades at $114.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check COKE's competition here
KO vs FIZZ Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while FIZZ trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check FIZZ's competition here
KO vs PRMW Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check PRMW's competition here
KO vs AKO-A Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while AKO-A trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check AKO-A's competition here
KO vs AKO-B Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while AKO-B trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check AKO-B's competition here
KO vs COCO Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while COCO trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check COCO's competition here
KO vs OTLY Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 446M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while OTLY trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check OTLY's competition here
KO vs ZVIA Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 209.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while ZVIA trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check ZVIA's competition here
KO vs SHOT Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while SHOT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -15.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check SHOT's competition here
KO vs BRFH Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while BRFH trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check BRFH's competition here
KO vs REED Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while REED trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is more volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check REED's competition here
KO vs WTER Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 247.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check WTER's competition here
KO vs NBEV Comparison July 2025
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 295.9B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $68.75, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.38, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check NBEV's competition here