Laser Photonics Corporation

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ETN trades at $392.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ETN's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PH trades at $738.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check PH's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while EMR trades at $149.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check EMR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ITW trades at $261.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ITW's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HWM trades at $189.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check HWM's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ROP trades at $563.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ROP's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CMI trades at $369.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CMI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AME trades at $180.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check AME's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ROK trades at $358.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ROK's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while B trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check B's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while IR trades at $88.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check IR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while OTIS trades at $89.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check OTIS's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while XYL trades at $132.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check XYL's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HWM-P trades at $69.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 96.80. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check HWM-P's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while DOV trades at $186.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check DOV's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PNR trades at $103.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check PNR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while IEX trades at $185.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check IEX's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GGG trades at $84.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GGG's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ITT trades at $161.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ITT's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NDSN trades at $220.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check NDSN's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CR trades at $190.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while RRX trades at $157.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check RRX's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AOS trades at $72.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check AOS's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GNRC trades at $156.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GNRC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SPXC trades at $180.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SPXC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while WTS trades at $252.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check WTS's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while DCI trades at $71.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check DCI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PSN trades at $76.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check PSN's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while MIDD trades at $149.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check MIDD's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTLS trades at $171.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GTLS's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while JBTM trades at $139.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -96.51. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check JBTM's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while FLS trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check FLS's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTES trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GTES's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while MIR trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -438.70. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check MIR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CSWI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NPO trades at $207.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 52.03. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check NPO's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while FELE trades at $92.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check FELE's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while KAI trades at $345.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check KAI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check AIMC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check JBT's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while MWA trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check MWA's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CXT trades at $59.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CXT's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ATS trades at $32.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -153.14. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ATS's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTLS-PB trades at $62.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CFX's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PSIX trades at $90.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check PSIX's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SHPW's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while EPAC trades at $38.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check EPAC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SXI trades at $166.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SXI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AMSC trades at $43.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check AMSC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NNE trades at $41.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -43.16. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check NNE's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while XMTR trades at $32.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check XMTR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ENOV trades at $27.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check ENOV's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HI trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE and HI have similar daily volatility (4.34).Check HI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TNC trades at $82.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check TNC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HLIO trades at $38.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check HLIO's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CIR trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CIR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GRC trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GRC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 992.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while KRNT trades at $21.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -121.61. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check KRNT's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BW-PA trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BW-PA's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 934.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while THR trades at $28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check THR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 878.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CYD trades at $23.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CYD's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SERV trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SERV's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 637.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BLDP trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BLDP's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 602.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GHM trades at $54.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 49.45. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GHM's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while OFLX trades at $34.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check OFLX's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BGRY's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 328.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while LXFR trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check LXFR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SIMA trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SIMA's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PKOH trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check PKOH's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while RR trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check RR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NPWR trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check NPWR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TAYD trades at $46.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check TAYD's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HURC trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check HURC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HUHU trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -59.69. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check HUHU's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TWIN trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check TWIN's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SHMD trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SHMD's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BW trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BW's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while XCH trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check XCH's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check PYR's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BWEN trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BWEN's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TPIC trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check TPIC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTEC trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check GTEC's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while WFF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check WFF's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HCAI trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check HCAI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while LBGJ trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -23.68. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check LBGJ's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CVV trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -373.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CVV's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BURU trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BURU's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while INLF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check INLF's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CETY trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CETY's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SHMDW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check SHMDW's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CGRN trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CGRN's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while JCSE trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check JCSE's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NMHI trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check NMHI's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 112.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check NMHIW's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CFXA trades at $177.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check CFXA's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check BGRYW's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while WBT trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check WBT's competition here

LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.4M. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while RAVN trades at $58.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.Check RAVN's competition here