Archaea Energy Inc.
Archaea Energy Inc. (LFG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFG | $26.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GEV | $644.59 | +3.30% | 175.6B | 156.54 | $4.12 | +0.12% |
| CEG | $327.35 | +1.77% | 102.6B | 34.49 | $9.49 | +0.45% |
| SMR | $51.67 | +1.25% | 15.4B | -37.73 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +4.42% |
| BEP-PA | $18.55 | +0.16% | 7.8B | -36.30 | -$0.51 | +5.35% |
| BEP | $27.24 | -0.58% | 7.8B | -27.02 | -$1.01 | +5.35% |
| CWEN-A | $29.58 | -1.40% | 6.3B | 36.99 | $0.80 | +5.44% |
| CWEN | $31.46 | -1.02% | 6.3B | 39.31 | $0.80 | +5.44% |
| ORA | $89.48 | +0.44% | 5.4B | 43.43 | $2.06 | +0.54% |
Stock Comparison
LFG vs GEV Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 175.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while GEV trades at $644.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 156.54. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check GEV's competition here
LFG vs CEG Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while CEG trades at $327.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check CEG's competition here
LFG vs SMR Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while SMR trades at $51.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -37.73. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check SMR's competition here
LFG vs AQNU Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check AQNU's competition here
LFG vs BEP-PA Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while BEP-PA trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -36.30. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is more volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check BEP-PA's competition here
LFG vs BEP Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while BEP trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -27.02. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to BEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check BEP's competition here
LFG vs CWEN-A Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while CWEN-A trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check CWEN-A's competition here
LFG vs CWEN Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while CWEN trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check CWEN's competition here
LFG vs ORA Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ORA trades at $89.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ORA's competition here
LFG vs BEPC Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while BEPC trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -26.21. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to BEPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check BEPC's competition here
LFG vs AQN Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while AQN trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check AQN's competition here
LFG vs ENLT Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ENLT trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ENLT's competition here
LFG vs EE Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while EE trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to EE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check EE's competition here
LFG vs RNW Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while RNW trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check RNW's competition here
LFG vs AY Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to AY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check AY's competition here
LFG vs SMR-WT Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check SMR-WT's competition here
LFG vs RNWWW Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while RNWWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check RNWWW's competition here
LFG vs FLNC Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while FLNC trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -42.64. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check FLNC's competition here
LFG vs NEP Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check NEP's competition here
LFG vs AMPS Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check AMPS's competition here
LFG vs ELLO Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ELLO trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ELLO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ELLO's competition here
LFG vs NRGV Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 207.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while NRGV trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to NRGV's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check NRGV's competition here
LFG vs NXXT Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while NXXT trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check NXXT's competition here
LFG vs VGAS Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while VGAS trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check VGAS's competition here
LFG vs AZRE Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check AZRE's competition here
LFG vs WAVE Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while WAVE trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -22.86. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check WAVE's competition here
LFG vs SUUN Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while SUUN trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check SUUN's competition here
LFG vs RAIN Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while RAIN trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to RAIN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check RAIN's competition here
LFG vs HTOOW Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while HTOOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check HTOOW's competition here
LFG vs HLGN-WT Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check HLGN-WT's competition here
LFG vs HLGN Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while HLGN trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to HLGN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check HLGN's competition here
LFG vs BNRG Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while BNRG trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to BNRG's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check BNRG's competition here
LFG vs HTOO Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while HTOO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to HTOO's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check HTOO's competition here
LFG vs ADN Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ADN trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ADN's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ADN's competition here
LFG vs CREG Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while CREG trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check CREG's competition here
LFG vs ALCE Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ALCE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ALCE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ALCE's competition here
LFG vs ELIQ Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ELIQ's competition here
LFG vs ADNWW Comparison July 2025
LFG plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFG stands at 0. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LFG is priced at $26.00, while ADNWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFG's ROE is N/A, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFG is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFG.Check ADNWW's competition here