Linde plc

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while SHW trades at $350.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SHW's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ECL trades at $268.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECL's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while APD trades at $289.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 40.93. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check APD's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while DD trades at $70.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 414.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DD's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while PPG trades at $105.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PPG's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while IFF trades at $66.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -41.28. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IFF's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while LYB trades at $49.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 104.38. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LYB's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while RPM trades at $119.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check RPM's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while SQM trades at $36.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SQM's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while WLK trades at $81.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -149.09. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WLK's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ALB trades at $67.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALB's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while AVTR trades at $11.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVTR's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while EMN trades at $60.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check EMN's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while NEU trades at $722.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NEU's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTM's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while AXTA trades at $28.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AXTA's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IKNX's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ESI trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ESI's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while BCPC trades at $160.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check BCPC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while SXT trades at $115.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.76. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SXT's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while CBT trades at $77.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CBT's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while HWKN trades at $170.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HWKN's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while SSL trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SSL's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while FUL trades at $55.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FUL's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while AVNT trades at $33.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVNT's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LTHM's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while WDFC trades at $219.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WDFC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while PRM trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PRM's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ASH trades at $51.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ASH's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while KWR trades at $124.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -302.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KWR's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while OLN trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -171.95. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OLN's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while IOSP trades at $78.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 105.77. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IOSP's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PQG's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while NGVT trades at $48.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NGVT's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while CC trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while MTX trades at $57.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 5801.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check MTX's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CCF's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while SCL trades at $49.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SCL's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 993.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ECVT trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -70.54. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECVT's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 865.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while REX trades at $51.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check REX's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 785.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ODC trades at $57.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ODC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 591.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while OEC trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OEC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 577M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while KOP trades at $32.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KOP's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 558.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while KRO trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRO's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while GPRE trades at $7.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GPRE's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 423.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while HDSN trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HDSN's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 334.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ADUR trades at $11.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -39.36. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ADUR's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while GEVO trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GEVO's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while LWLG trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LWLG's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 153.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while CMT trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CMT's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ALTO trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTO's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while LOOP trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LOOP's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while TSE trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSE's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TSE's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while NTIC trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NTIC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while FSI trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FSI's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check VNTR's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while SNES trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SNES's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while GURE trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GURE's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while CNEY trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CNEY's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while CRKN trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CRKN's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DNMR's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 725.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while HGAS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGAS's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGASW's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 1.15 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FOE's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AMRS's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GCP's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TREC's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRA's competition here

LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 221.5B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $471.48, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.62, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ZY's competition here