Linde plc
Linde plc LIN Peers
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $460.20 | -0.64% | 216.6B | 33.37 | $13.79 | +1.25% |
| SHW | $343.61 | -0.60% | 86.1B | 32.51 | $10.57 | +0.87% |
| ECL | $266.48 | -0.13% | 75.6B | 36.31 | $7.34 | +0.95% |
| APD | $282.05 | +0.37% | 62.8B | 40.58 | $6.95 | +2.55% |
| DD | $68.00 | -0.31% | 28.5B | 2266.67 | $0.03 | +2.32% |
| PPG | $113.27 | -0.54% | 25.7B | 20.05 | $5.65 | +2.40% |
| IFF | $74.26 | -0.62% | 19B | -22.78 | -$3.26 | +2.13% |
| LYB | $57.49 | -1.45% | 18.5B | 19.89 | $2.89 | +9.29% |
| RPM | $109.02 | -1.09% | 14B | 21.85 | $4.99 | +1.80% |
| SQM | $34.27 | +0.93% | 9.6B | 16.24 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while SHW trades at $343.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ECL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ECL trades at $266.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs APD Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while APD trades at $282.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN and APD have similar daily volatility (0.88).
LIN vs DD Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while DD trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2266.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PPG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while PPG trades at $113.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IFF Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while IFF trades at $74.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -22.78. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LYB Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while LYB trades at $57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs RPM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while RPM trades at $109.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SQM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while SQM trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs WLK Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while WLK trades at $74.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVTR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while AVTR trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs EMN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while EMN trades at $75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALB Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ALB trades at $60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AXTA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while AXTA trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NEU Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while NEU trades at $672.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALTM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IKNX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ESI Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ESI trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs BCPC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while BCPC trades at $158.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.94. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SXT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while SXT trades at $98.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CBT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while CBT trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs WDFC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while WDFC trades at $228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FUL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while FUL trades at $55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVNT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while AVNT trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LTHM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HWKN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while HWKN trades at $138.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SSL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while SSL trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs OLN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while OLN trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ASH Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ASH trades at $49.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.56. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IOSP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while IOSP trades at $83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 77.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PRM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while PRM trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KWR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while KWR trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PQG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs MTX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while MTX trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -69.78. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while CC trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 63.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NGVT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while NGVT trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SCL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while SCL trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CCF Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ECVT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 986.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ECVT trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -84.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs REX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 810.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while REX trades at $49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ODC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 778.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ODC trades at $57.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KRO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 719.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while KRO trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KOP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 632.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while KOP trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs OEC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while OEC trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GPRE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 377.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while GPRE trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HDSN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while HDSN trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GEVO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while GEVO trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ADUR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 294.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ADUR trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -34.72. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LWLG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while LWLG trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CMT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while CMT trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs TSE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while TSE trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALTO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ALTO trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LOOP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while LOOP trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -7.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NTIC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while NTIC trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FSI Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while FSI trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs VNTR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GURE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while GURE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CNEY Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while CNEY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SNES Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while SNES trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CRKN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while CRKN trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs DNMR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HGAS Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 833.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while HGAS trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HGASW Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 8K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs MOOV Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 0.88 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
LIN vs GCP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AMRS Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ZY Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KRA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FOE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs TREC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 216.6B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $460.20, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.37, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.