Luk Fook Holdings (International) Limited
Luk Fook Holdings (International) Limited (LKFLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LKFLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKFLF | $2.70 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 11.25 | $0.24 | +5.66% |
| HESAF | $2,796.50 | +0.47% | 296.5B | 55.04 | $51.38 | +1.04% |
| HESAY | $281.15 | +2.05% | 294.7B | 54.70 | $5.14 | +0.99% |
| LVMUY | $115.93 | +5.39% | 287.9B | 22.37 | $5.18 | +1.75% |
| LVMHF | $579.05 | +4.39% | 287.1B | 22.35 | $25.90 | +2.48% |
| CFRUY | $17.53 | +0.63% | 105.6B | 24.31 | $0.72 | +1.84% |
| CFRHF | $176.01 | -1.94% | 103B | 23.66 | $7.44 | +1.85% |
| CHDRY | $136.95 | +5.09% | 98.8B | 16.25 | $8.43 | +2.52% |
| CHDRF | $529.59 | -0.00% | 95.5B | 15.63 | $33.89 | +2.58% |
| PPRUY | $26.17 | +6.04% | 32B | 24.17 | $1.08 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
LKFLF vs HESAF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 296.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while HESAF trades at $2,796.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 55.04. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check HESAF's competition here
LKFLF vs HESAY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 294.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while HESAY trades at $281.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 54.70. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check HESAY's competition here
LKFLF vs LVMUY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 287.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while LVMUY trades at $115.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check LVMUY's competition here
LKFLF vs LVMHF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 287.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while LVMHF trades at $579.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check LVMHF's competition here
LKFLF vs CFRUY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CFRUY trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CFRUY's competition here
LKFLF vs CFRHF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CFRHF trades at $176.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CFRHF's competition here
LKFLF vs CHDRY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CHDRY trades at $136.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CHDRY's competition here
LKFLF vs CHDRF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CHDRF trades at $529.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CHDRF's competition here
LKFLF vs PPRUY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while PPRUY trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check PPRUY's competition here
LKFLF vs PPRUF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while PPRUF trades at $260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check PPRUF's competition here
LKFLF vs CJEWY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CJEWY trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CJEWY's competition here
LKFLF vs PRDSY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while PRDSY trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check PRDSY's competition here
LKFLF vs CJEWF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CJEWF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CJEWF's competition here
LKFLF vs PRDSF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while PRDSF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check PRDSF's competition here
LKFLF vs PNDZF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while PNDZF trades at $163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check PNDZF's competition here
LKFLF vs SWGAY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while SWGAY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 142.14. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check SWGAY's competition here
LKFLF vs SWGNF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while SWGNF trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 126.33. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check SWGNF's competition here
LKFLF vs SWGAF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while SWGAF trades at $169.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 113.82. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check SWGAF's competition here
LKFLF vs BURBY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while BURBY trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -65.82. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BURBY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check BURBY's competition here
LKFLF vs BBRYF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while BBRYF trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -65.29. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check BBRYF's competition here
LKFLF vs PANDY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check PANDY's competition here
LKFLF vs BCUCY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while BCUCY trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 56.62. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check BCUCY's competition here
LKFLF vs WOSGF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while WOSGF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check WOSGF's competition here
LKFLF vs SFRGF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while SFRGF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check SFRGF's competition here
LKFLF vs SFRGY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while SFRGY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check SFRGY's competition here
LKFLF vs CHOWF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 712M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CHOWF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CHOWF's competition here
LKFLF vs EPRJF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while EPRJF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check EPRJF's competition here
LKFLF vs FLLIY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 404.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while FLLIY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check FLLIY's competition here
LKFLF vs ZAPNF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check ZAPNF's competition here
LKFLF vs ORWHF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check ORWHF's competition here
LKFLF vs DCOHF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while DCOHF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check DCOHF's competition here
LKFLF vs TSSJF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check TSSJF's competition here
LKFLF vs HENGF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check HENGF's competition here
LKFLF vs CTTLF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CTTLF's competition here
LKFLF vs CEBTF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check CEBTF's competition here
LKFLF vs MNNGF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check MNNGF's competition here
LKFLF vs MENEF Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while MENEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check MENEF's competition here
LKFLF vs MDNL Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check MDNL's competition here
LKFLF vs MAJJ Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check MAJJ's competition here
LKFLF vs BANI Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check BANI's competition here
LKFLF vs HENGY Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check HENGY's competition here
LKFLF vs EATR Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check EATR's competition here
LKFLF vs SSOK Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 494.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while SSOK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check SSOK's competition here
LKFLF vs BRGO Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check BRGO's competition here
LKFLF vs AVEW Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 125K. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check AVEW's competition here
LKFLF vs MASN Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 122.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check MASN's competition here
LKFLF vs BRGOD Comparison July 2025
LKFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKFLF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LKFLF is priced at $2.70, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LKFLF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKFLF is more volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKFLF.Check BRGOD's competition here