LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 373.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HD trades at $375.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HD's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HD's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LOW trades at $226.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LOW's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FND trades at $79.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FND's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while MLHR trades at $38.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MLHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check MLHR's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while ARHS trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check ARHS's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 348.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT-A trades at $21.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT-A's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT trades at $21.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 296.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while TTSH trades at $6.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is 662.00. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TTSH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check TTSH's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LESL trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LESL's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LIVE trades at $16.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LIVE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LIVE's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while PFAI trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check PFAI's competition here

LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HBP trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HBP's competition here