Linkers Industries Limited
Linkers Industries Limited (LNKS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNKS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNKS | $0.64 | +2.55% | 9M | -16.68 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| CRS | $276.44 | +1.27% | 13.8B | 39.13 | $7.06 | +0.29% |
| ATI | $94.99 | +1.85% | 13.4B | 34.43 | $2.76 | N/A |
| MLI | $88.72 | +0.48% | 9.8B | 14.10 | $6.29 | +1.01% |
| ESAB | $133.28 | +0.92% | 8.1B | 27.65 | $4.82 | +0.26% |
| AZZ | $109.69 | +0.39% | 3.3B | 12.41 | $8.83 | +0.64% |
| WOR | $61.66 | -0.88% | 3.1B | 32.10 | $1.92 | +1.10% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| CMPO | $14.28 | -1.79% | 1.5B | -10.82 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| CMPOW | $6.50 | -1.96% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LNKS vs CRS Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while CRS trades at $276.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CRS's competition here
LNKS vs ATI Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while ATI trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ATI's competition here
LNKS vs MLI Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while MLI trades at $88.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MLI's competition here
LNKS vs ESAB Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while ESAB trades at $133.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ESAB's competition here
LNKS vs AZZ Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while AZZ trades at $109.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AZZ's competition here
LNKS vs WOR Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while WOR trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check WOR's competition here
LNKS vs ARNC Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ARNC's competition here
LNKS vs CMPO Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while CMPO trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPO's competition here
LNKS vs CMPOW Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while CMPOW trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPOW's competition here
LNKS vs PRLB Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 929.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while PRLB trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check PRLB's competition here
LNKS vs HAYN Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check HAYN's competition here
LNKS vs RYI Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 729.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while RYI trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -102.95. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check RYI's competition here
LNKS vs IIIN Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while IIIN trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check IIIN's competition here
LNKS vs NWPX Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while NWPX trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check NWPX's competition here
LNKS vs MEC Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while MEC trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MEC's competition here
LNKS vs TG Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while TG trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -302.33. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TG's competition here
LNKS vs GIFI Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while GIFI trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check GIFI's competition here
LNKS vs MTEN Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while MTEN trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MTEN's competition here
LNKS vs AP Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while AP trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AP's competition here
LNKS vs TPCS Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while TPCS trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TPCS's competition here
LNKS vs TRSG Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while TRSG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TRSG's competition here
LNKS vs HIHO Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while HIHO trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is 83.07. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HIHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check HIHO's competition here
LNKS vs SGBX Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while SGBX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check SGBX's competition here
LNKS vs AP-WT Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AP-WT's competition here
LNKS vs ALPP Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ALPP's competition here
LNKS vs CDSI Comparison July 2025
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 9M. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.64, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.68, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LNKS has daily volatility of 9.64 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here