Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares
Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares LOT Peers
See (LOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOT | $2.21 | +1.61% | 1.5B | -1.28 | -$1.72 | N/A |
| TSLA | $295.14 | +3.67% | 949.3B | 167.69 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TM | $185.15 | +0.41% | 241.6B | 7.41 | $25.00 | +2.92% |
| RACE | $482.56 | +0.46% | 86B | 48.06 | $10.04 | +0.62% |
| GM | $47.46 | +0.44% | 45.6B | 6.63 | $7.16 | +1.33% |
| F-PD | $21.94 | -0.05% | 40.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.31% |
| F-PB | $20.79 | -0.10% | 40.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.31% |
| F-PC | $20.77 | +0.19% | 40.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.31% |
| F | $10.26 | +1.58% | 40.1B | 8.20 | $1.25 | +7.31% |
| STLA | $9.87 | +1.96% | 28.3B | 4.72 | $2.09 | +8.90% |
Stock Comparison
LOT vs TSLA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 949.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while TSLA trades at $295.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 167.69. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs TM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 241.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while TM trades at $185.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs RACE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while RACE trades at $482.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while GM trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F-PD Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while F-PD trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F-PB Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while F-PB trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F-PC Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while F-PC trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while F trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs STLA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while STLA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs XPEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while XPEV trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs RIVN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while RIVN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LI Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while LI trades at $29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs HMC Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while HMC trades at $29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VFS Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while VFS trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs NIO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while NIO trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to NIO's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ZK Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ZK trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LCID Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while LCID trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PSNY Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while PSNY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs BLBD Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while BLBD trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LVWR Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while LVWR trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs NAKD Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VFSWW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 675.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while VFSWW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PSNYW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 315.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while PSNYW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs NIU Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while NIU trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFAI Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while FFAI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFIE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFIEW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LOTWW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs CJET Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while CJET trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FSR Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs CENN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while CENN trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SOLO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs RIDE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FLYE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while FLYE trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GP Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while GP trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ECDA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ECDA trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ARVL Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs WKHS Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while WKHS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SVMH Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GOEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LOBO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while LOBO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs EVTV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while EVTV trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs HYZN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs DMN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs AYRO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while AYRO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VLCN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while VLCN trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs EGOX Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFAIW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs AIEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while AIEV trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs MULN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while MULN trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ZAPP Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ECDAW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 392.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ECDAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GOEVW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ELMS Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs TTM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SOLOW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PTRA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ADOM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.21, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.28, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.