Stride, Inc.
Stride, Inc. LRN Peers
See (LRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRN | $145.29 | +0.41% | 6.3B | 22.77 | $6.38 | N/A |
| EDU | $46.84 | -2.38% | 7.7B | 20.37 | $2.30 | +1.24% |
| TAL | $10.62 | +1.14% | 6.4B | 75.86 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LOPE | $194.20 | +1.92% | 5.5B | 24.40 | $7.96 | N/A |
| ATGE | $128.11 | +0.20% | 4.6B | 21.68 | $5.91 | N/A |
| GHC | $959.82 | +0.25% | 4.2B | 6.80 | $141.09 | +0.74% |
| LAUR | $22.31 | +0.22% | 3.3B | 11.99 | $1.86 | N/A |
| PRDO | $33.00 | -0.81% | 2.2B | 14.67 | $2.25 | +1.58% |
| STRA | $89.41 | -0.21% | 2.2B | 19.23 | $4.65 | +2.69% |
| UTI | $35.35 | +0.93% | 1.9B | 33.66 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LRN vs EDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while EDU trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TAL Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while TAL trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 75.86. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LOPE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while LOPE trades at $194.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ATGE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while ATGE trades at $128.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GHC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GHC trades at $959.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LAUR Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while LAUR trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs PRDO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while PRDO trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs STRA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while STRA trades at $89.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs UTI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while UTI trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AFYA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while AFYA trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GOTU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GOTU trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs COUR Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while COUR trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KLC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while KLC trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs UDMY Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while UDMY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -16.89. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs DAO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while DAO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ARCE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs REDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LINC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 728.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while LINC trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 59.10. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs APEI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 510.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while APEI trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs QSG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while QSG trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VSTA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 336M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while VSTA trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VTRU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTRU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs RYET Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while RYET trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -255.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs CHGG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while CHGG trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs SKIL Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while SKIL trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LGCY Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while LGCY trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs STG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while STG trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KIDZ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while KIDZ trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -124.67. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ONE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ONE's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GNS Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GNS trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs IH Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while IH trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BTCT Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while BTCT trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AIU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GEHI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs YQ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while YQ trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EDTK Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while EDTK trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while BEDU trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AACG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while AACG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs JZ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while JZ trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VSA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while VSA trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GV Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GV trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EEIQ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while EEIQ trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs WAFU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while WAFU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GSUN Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GSUN trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TCTM Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TWOU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -14.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs MYND Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while MYND trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs CLEU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KIDZW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while KIDZW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs METX Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ASPU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while ASPU trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs COE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while COE trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LXEH Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while LXEH trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs FEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while FEDU trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 97.65. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs RYB Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AMBO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 374.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while AMBO trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BTCTW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs FHS Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ZVO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ZME Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs NEW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GPX Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs HMHC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs HLG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.29, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.