Livent Corporation
Livent Corporation (LTHM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LTHM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTHM | $16.51 | -8.53% | 3B | 9.17 | $1.80 | N/A |
| LIN | $471.49 | +0.32% | 221.9B | 34.22 | $13.78 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $340.21 | -0.80% | 85.3B | 33.76 | $10.08 | +0.89% |
| ECL | $269.83 | +0.50% | 76.6B | 36.69 | $7.36 | +0.93% |
| APD | $297.22 | -0.22% | 66.2B | 42.77 | $6.95 | +2.40% |
| DD | $74.80 | -2.32% | 31.3B | 2493.33 | $0.03 | +2.12% |
| PPG | $115.02 | -1.36% | 26.1B | 20.32 | $5.66 | +2.37% |
| LYB | $60.70 | -9.70% | 19.5B | 21.00 | $2.89 | +8.99% |
| IFF | $75.88 | -2.03% | 19.4B | -23.27 | -$3.26 | +2.11% |
| RPM | $122.64 | +8.58% | 15.7B | 24.55 | $4.99 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
LTHM vs LIN Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LIN trades at $471.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check LIN's competition here
LTHM vs SHW Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SHW trades at $340.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check SHW's competition here
LTHM vs ECL Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ECL trades at $269.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ECL's competition here
LTHM vs APD Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while APD trades at $297.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check APD's competition here
LTHM vs DD Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while DD trades at $74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2493.33. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check DD's competition here
LTHM vs PPG Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while PPG trades at $115.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check PPG's competition here
LTHM vs LYB Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LYB trades at $60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check LYB's competition here
LTHM vs IFF Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while IFF trades at $75.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.27. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check IFF's competition here
LTHM vs RPM Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while RPM trades at $122.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check RPM's competition here
LTHM vs SQM Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SQM trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check SQM's competition here
LTHM vs WLK Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while WLK trades at $82.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check WLK's competition here
LTHM vs ALB Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ALB trades at $84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ALB's competition here
LTHM vs AVTR Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AVTR trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check AVTR's competition here
LTHM vs EMN Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while EMN trades at $77.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check EMN's competition here
LTHM vs NEU Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while NEU trades at $718.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check NEU's competition here
LTHM vs AXTA Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AXTA trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check AXTA's competition here
LTHM vs ALTM Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ALTM's competition here
LTHM vs IKNX Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check IKNX's competition here
LTHM vs ESI Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ESI trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ESI's competition here
LTHM vs BCPC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while BCPC trades at $149.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check BCPC's competition here
LTHM vs SXT Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SXT trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check SXT's competition here
LTHM vs CBT Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CBT trades at $75.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check CBT's competition here
LTHM vs SSL Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SSL trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check SSL's competition here
LTHM vs HWKN Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HWKN trades at $154.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check HWKN's competition here
LTHM vs FUL Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while FUL trades at $59.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check FUL's competition here
LTHM vs AVNT Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AVNT trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check AVNT's competition here
LTHM vs WDFC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while WDFC trades at $210.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check WDFC's competition here
LTHM vs PRM Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while PRM trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check PRM's competition here
LTHM vs OLN Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while OLN trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check OLN's competition here
LTHM vs ASH Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ASH trades at $50.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.97. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ASH's competition here
LTHM vs KWR Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KWR trades at $121.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check KWR's competition here
LTHM vs IOSP Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while IOSP trades at $84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 77.91. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check IOSP's competition here
LTHM vs CC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CC trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 77.75. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check CC's competition here
LTHM vs PQG Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check PQG's competition here
LTHM vs MTX Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while MTX trades at $59.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -75.97. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check MTX's competition here
LTHM vs NGVT Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while NGVT trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check NGVT's competition here
LTHM vs SCL Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SCL trades at $56.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check SCL's competition here
LTHM vs CCF Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check CCF's competition here
LTHM vs ECVT Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ECVT trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -87.70. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ECVT's competition here
LTHM vs REX Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 882.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while REX trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check REX's competition here
LTHM vs ODC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 814.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ODC trades at $59.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ODC's competition here
LTHM vs KRO Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KRO trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check KRO's competition here
LTHM vs KOP Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 669.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KOP trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check KOP's competition here
LTHM vs OEC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 632.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while OEC trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check OEC's competition here
LTHM vs GPRE Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 527.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GPRE trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check GPRE's competition here
LTHM vs HDSN Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HDSN trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check HDSN's competition here
LTHM vs GEVO Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 359.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GEVO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check GEVO's competition here
LTHM vs LWLG Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LWLG trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check LWLG's competition here
LTHM vs ADUR Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ADUR trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -38.79. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ADUR's competition here
LTHM vs CMT Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CMT trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check CMT's competition here
LTHM vs TSE Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 106.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while TSE trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check TSE's competition here
LTHM vs ALTO Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ALTO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ALTO's competition here
LTHM vs NTIC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while NTIC trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check NTIC's competition here
LTHM vs FSI Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while FSI trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check FSI's competition here
LTHM vs LOOP Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LOOP trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check LOOP's competition here
LTHM vs VNTR Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check VNTR's competition here
LTHM vs SNES Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SNES trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check SNES's competition here
LTHM vs GURE Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GURE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check GURE's competition here
LTHM vs CNEY Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CNEY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check CNEY's competition here
LTHM vs CRKN Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CRKN trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check CRKN's competition here
LTHM vs DNMR Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check DNMR's competition here
LTHM vs HGAS Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 777.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HGAS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check HGAS's competition here
LTHM vs HGASW Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check HGASW's competition here
LTHM vs MOOV Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LTHM has daily volatility of 11.04 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LTHM vs AMRS Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check AMRS's competition here
LTHM vs ZY Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check ZY's competition here
LTHM vs KRA Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check KRA's competition here
LTHM vs TREC Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check TREC's competition here
LTHM vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LTHM vs FOE Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check FOE's competition here
LTHM vs GCP Comparison July 2025
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.Check GCP's competition here