LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYB | $49.55 | +1.00% | 15.6B | 102.86 | $0.47 | +11.09% |
| LIN | $471.48 | -0.20% | 220.6B | 33.41 | $14.08 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $350.73 | -0.41% | 88.4B | 35.22 | $10.07 | +0.85% |
| ECL | $268.79 | -1.50% | 77.6B | 36.56 | $7.48 | +0.92% |
| APD | $289.05 | +0.11% | 63.2B | 40.29 | $7.05 | +2.51% |
| DD | $70.80 | +0.47% | 29.3B | 411.29 | $0.17 | +2.25% |
| PPG | $105.68 | -1.19% | 24B | 19.26 | $5.53 | +2.58% |
| IFF | $66.16 | +4.09% | 16.3B | -41.21 | -$1.54 | +2.53% |
| RPM | $119.75 | +0.08% | 15.3B | 22.31 | $5.35 | +1.71% |
| SQM | $36.29 | -14.05% | 11.6B | 21.75 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYB vs LIN Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 220.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while LIN trades at $471.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check LIN's competition here
LYB vs SHW Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 88.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while SHW trades at $350.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check SHW's competition here
LYB vs ECL Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ECL trades at $268.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.56. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ECL's competition here
LYB vs APD Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while APD trades at $289.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check APD's competition here
LYB vs DD Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while DD trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 411.29. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check DD's competition here
LYB vs PPG Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while PPG trades at $105.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check PPG's competition here
LYB vs IFF Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while IFF trades at $66.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -41.21. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check IFF's competition here
LYB vs RPM Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while RPM trades at $119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check RPM's competition here
LYB vs SQM Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while SQM trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check SQM's competition here
LYB vs WLK Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while WLK trades at $81.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -147.92. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check WLK's competition here
LYB vs ALB Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ALB trades at $67.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ALB's competition here
LYB vs AVTR Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while AVTR trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check AVTR's competition here
LYB vs NEU Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while NEU trades at $722.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check NEU's competition here
LYB vs EMN Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while EMN trades at $60.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check EMN's competition here
LYB vs ALTM Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ALTM's competition here
LYB vs AXTA Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while AXTA trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check AXTA's competition here
LYB vs IKNX Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check IKNX's competition here
LYB vs ESI Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ESI trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ESI's competition here
LYB vs BCPC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while BCPC trades at $160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check BCPC's competition here
LYB vs SXT Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while SXT trades at $115.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check SXT's competition here
LYB vs CBT Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while CBT trades at $77.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check CBT's competition here
LYB vs HWKN Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while HWKN trades at $170.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check HWKN's competition here
LYB vs SSL Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while SSL trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check SSL's competition here
LYB vs FUL Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while FUL trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check FUL's competition here
LYB vs AVNT Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while AVNT trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check AVNT's competition here
LYB vs LTHM Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check LTHM's competition here
LYB vs WDFC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while WDFC trades at $219.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check WDFC's competition here
LYB vs PRM Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while PRM trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check PRM's competition here
LYB vs ASH Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ASH trades at $51.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ASH's competition here
LYB vs KWR Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while KWR trades at $124.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -294.98. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check KWR's competition here
LYB vs OLN Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while OLN trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -170.32. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check OLN's competition here
LYB vs IOSP Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while IOSP trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 105.42. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check IOSP's competition here
LYB vs PQG Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check PQG's competition here
LYB vs NGVT Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while NGVT trades at $48.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check NGVT's competition here
LYB vs MTX Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while MTX trades at $57.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 5834.00. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check MTX's competition here
LYB vs CC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while CC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check CC's competition here
LYB vs CCF Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check CCF's competition here
LYB vs SCL Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while SCL trades at $49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check SCL's competition here
LYB vs ECVT Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ECVT trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -73.17. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ECVT's competition here
LYB vs REX Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 877.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while REX trades at $51.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check REX's competition here
LYB vs ODC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 790.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ODC trades at $57.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ODC's competition here
LYB vs KRO Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 579.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while KRO trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check KRO's competition here
LYB vs GPRE Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 577.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while GPRE trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check GPRE's competition here
LYB vs KOP Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 568.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while KOP trades at $32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check KOP's competition here
LYB vs OEC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 549.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while OEC trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check OEC's competition here
LYB vs HDSN Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 424.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while HDSN trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check HDSN's competition here
LYB vs ADUR Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 350.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ADUR trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -41.31. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ADUR's competition here
LYB vs GEVO Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 299.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while GEVO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check GEVO's competition here
LYB vs LWLG Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while LWLG trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check LWLG's competition here
LYB vs CMT Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while CMT trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check CMT's competition here
LYB vs ALTO Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ALTO trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ALTO's competition here
LYB vs LOOP Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while LOOP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check LOOP's competition here
LYB vs TSE Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while TSE trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSE's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check TSE's competition here
LYB vs NTIC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while NTIC trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check NTIC's competition here
LYB vs FSI Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while FSI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check FSI's competition here
LYB vs VNTR Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check VNTR's competition here
LYB vs SNES Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while SNES trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check SNES's competition here
LYB vs GURE Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while GURE trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check GURE's competition here
LYB vs CNEY Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while CNEY trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check CNEY's competition here
LYB vs CRKN Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while CRKN trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check CRKN's competition here
LYB vs DNMR Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check DNMR's competition here
LYB vs HGAS Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 725.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while HGAS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check HGAS's competition here
LYB vs HGASW Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check HGASW's competition here
LYB vs MOOV Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LYB has daily volatility of 7.07 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LYB vs FOE Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check FOE's competition here
LYB vs AMRS Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check AMRS's competition here
LYB vs AVTR-PA Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LYB vs GCP Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check GCP's competition here
LYB vs TREC Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check TREC's competition here
LYB vs KRA Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check KRA's competition here
LYB vs ZY Comparison August 2025
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $49.55, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 102.86, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.Check ZY's competition here