Lyft, Inc.
Lyft, Inc. LYFT Peers
See (LYFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | $14.38 | -2.38% | 5.9B | 95.87 | $0.15 | N/A |
| SAP | $286.16 | -1.54% | 333.8B | 50.20 | $5.70 | +0.91% |
| CRM | $267.70 | +0.18% | 255.9B | 41.90 | $6.39 | +0.61% |
| INTU | $781.21 | +0.67% | 217.8B | 63.65 | $12.27 | +0.53% |
| NOW | $996.18 | +4.16% | 206.4B | 135.36 | $7.36 | N/A |
| UBER | $90.87 | +1.03% | 190.1B | 15.92 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $122.08 | -0.11% | 157.7B | 100.06 | $1.22 | N/A |
| APP | $359.94 | -0.60% | 121.8B | 65.09 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $414.92 | +0.55% | 117.7B | -18.65 | -$22.26 | N/A |
| STRK | $111.40 | -2.49% | 114.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYFT vs SAP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 333.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SAP trades at $286.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CRM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 255.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CRM trades at $267.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.90. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs INTU Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 217.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while INTU trades at $781.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.65. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NOW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while NOW trades at $996.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 135.36. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs UBER Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 190.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while UBER trades at $90.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SHOP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SHOP trades at $122.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 100.06. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs APP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while APP trades at $359.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 65.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs MSTR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while MSTR trades at $414.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.65. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs STRK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while STRK trades at $111.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CDNS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CDNS trades at $324.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 82.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SNOW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SNOW trades at $215.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -51.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ADSK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ADSK trades at $301.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 64.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs WDAY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while WDAY trades at $237.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.51. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TEAM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while TEAM trades at $199.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -121.11. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DDOG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DDOG trades at $146.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 318.61. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TTD Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while TTD trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 103.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs FICO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while FICO trades at $1,535.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 65.97. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ANSS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs HUBS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while HUBS trades at $552.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1254.45. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs STRF Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while STRF trades at $112.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PTC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PTC trades at $202.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 55.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TYL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while TYL trades at $559.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.73. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ZM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ZM trades at $75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SSNC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SSNC trades at $85.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GRAB Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while GRAB trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 534.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GWRE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while GWRE trades at $223.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 532.79. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BSY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BSY trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 74.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs AZPN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DUOL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DUOL trades at $360.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 177.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DT trades at $54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DOCU Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DOCU trades at $80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs MNDY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while MNDY trades at $289.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 286.41. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs QXO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while QXO trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.51. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs U Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while U trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PAYC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PAYC trades at $237.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs MANH Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while MANH trades at $220.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BKI Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PCOR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PCOR trades at $74.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -86.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs XM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CDAY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TTAN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while TTAN trades at $117.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PCTY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PCTY trades at $188.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 46.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NICE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while NICE trades at $161.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PEGA Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PEGA trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DAY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DAY trades at $59.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 371.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs APPF Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while APPF trades at $261.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ESTC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ESTC trades at $88.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -85.29. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DSGX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DSGX trades at $106.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SRAD Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SRAD trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 140.75. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NATI Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SMAR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs OTEX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while OTEX trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BULL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BULL trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GTLB Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while GTLB trades at $46.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 519.56. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CVLT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CVLT trades at $165.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 98.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs COUP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CWAN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CWAN trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs IDCC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while IDCC trades at $224.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs LIF Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while LIF trades at $75.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 579.54. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while QTWO trades at $89.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -262.82. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs VERX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while VERX trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -119.93. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RIOT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while RIOT trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SOUN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while SOUN trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -19.61. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs FROG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while FROG trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -58.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BILL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BILL trades at $45.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2260.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RUM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while RUM trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs FRSH Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while FRSH trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -59.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CVT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PYCR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RUMBW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while RUMBW trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ETWO-WT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PWSC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ZI Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GRND Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while GRND trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -31.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ZETA Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ZETA trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -63.56. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs COMP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while COMP trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -54.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs WK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while WK trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.31. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CALX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CALX trades at $55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -134.85. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NCNO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while NCNO trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -122.64. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs AYX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BL trades at $56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ASAN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ASAN trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ENV Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CLSK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while CLSK trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs INST Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs INTA Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while INTA trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GBTG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while GBTG trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -66.75. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BRZE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BRZE trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -28.45. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs AGYS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while AGYS trades at $113.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 231.61. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BLKB Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BLKB trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ALIT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ALIT trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.75. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BTDR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while BTDR trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ALKT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ALKT trades at $27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -74.11. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DAVE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DAVE trades at $208.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 58.87. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs YOU Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while YOU trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PAR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while PAR trades at $68.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.76. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ALRM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while ALRM trades at $55.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DAVEW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while DAVEW trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs KC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.38, while KC trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 95.87, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.