The Macerich Company
The Macerich Company MAC Peers
See (MAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAC | $16.11 | +2.51% | 4.1B | -32.87 | -$0.49 | +4.24% |
| SPG | $162.08 | +0.83% | 52.9B | 25.77 | $6.29 | +5.09% |
| SPG-PJ | $59.51 | +1.77% | 52.3B | 8.78 | $6.78 | +5.09% |
| O | $56.00 | +0.30% | 50.6B | 50.90 | $1.10 | +5.69% |
| KIM-PN | $59.00 | -2.98% | 39.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.96% |
| KIM | $20.98 | +0.74% | 14.2B | 27.60 | $0.76 | +4.73% |
| KIM-PL | $19.82 | -0.65% | 14.2B | 12.04 | $1.65 | +4.73% |
| KIM-PM | $20.13 | -0.14% | 14.2B | 12.23 | $1.65 | +4.73% |
| REG | $72.01 | +1.08% | 13.1B | 34.13 | $2.11 | +3.83% |
| FRT | $96.39 | +2.03% | 8.3B | 27.70 | $3.48 | +4.56% |
Stock Comparison
MAC vs SPG Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SPG trades at $162.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs SPG-PJ Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SPG-PJ trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs O Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while O trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas O's P/E ratio is 50.90. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs KIM-PN Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while KIM-PN trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs KIM Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while KIM trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs KIM-PL Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while KIM-PL trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs KIM-PM Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while KIM-PM trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs REG Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while REG trades at $72.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs FRT Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while FRT trades at $96.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs FRT-PC Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while FRT-PC trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs ADC Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while ADC trades at $73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs NNN Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while NNN trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs BRX Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while BRX trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs KRG Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while KRG trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 322.64. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs PECO Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while PECO trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs REGCP Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while REGCP trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs REGCO Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while REGCO trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs SKT Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SKT trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs FCPT Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while FCPT trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs AKR Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while AKR trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs CURB Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while CURB trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 189.67. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs ROIC Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs IVT Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while IVT trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 117.21. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs ADC-PA Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while ADC-PA trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs GTY Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while GTY trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs NTST Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while NTST trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -108.07. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs ALX Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while ALX trades at $229.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs RPT-PD Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs BFS-PD Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 840.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while BFS-PD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs UBP Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs UBA Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs BFS Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 831.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while BFS trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs UBP-PK Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs CBL Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 792.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while CBL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs UBP-PH Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WSR Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WSR trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs SITC Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SITC trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs BFS-PE Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while BFS-PE trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs SITC-PA Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs PINE Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while PINE trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 192.13. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs CDR-PB Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while CDR-PB trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs CDR-PC Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while CDR-PC trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs SRG Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SRG trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs SRG-PA Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while SRG-PA trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WHLRD Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WHLRD trades at $34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WHLRP Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WHLRP trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WHLR Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WHLR trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WHLRL Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WHLRL trades at $183.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -98.16. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs NNN-PF Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs BPYU Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WRI Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs PEI Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs HMG Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs RVI Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs PEI-PC Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs PEI-PD Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs CDR Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs PEI-PB Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs BPYUP Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.
MAC vs WPG Comparison
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $16.11, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -32.87, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.