Mattel, Inc.
Mattel, Inc. (MAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAT | $17.43 | +3.20% | 5.6B | 11.32 | $1.54 | N/A |
| CCL | $29.75 | -0.10% | 38.7B | 15.58 | $1.91 | N/A |
| CUK | $27.17 | +0.17% | 36.7B | 14.23 | $1.91 | N/A |
| AS | $37.66 | +2.28% | 20.9B | 101.81 | $0.37 | N/A |
| HAS | $74.98 | -0.09% | 10.5B | -18.42 | -$4.07 | +3.74% |
| PLNT | $112.75 | +0.30% | 9.5B | 53.44 | $2.11 | N/A |
| LTH | $29.22 | +0.45% | 6.4B | 30.44 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GOLF | $82.34 | +0.21% | 4.8B | 22.61 | $3.64 | +1.09% |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
| YETI | $38.86 | +5.60% | 3.2B | 18.77 | $2.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MAT vs CCL Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while CCL trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check CCL's competition here
MAT vs CUK Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while CUK trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check CUK's competition here
MAT vs AS Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while AS trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 101.81. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check AS's competition here
MAT vs HAS Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while HAS trades at $74.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check HAS's competition here
MAT vs PLNT Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while PLNT trades at $112.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 53.44. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check PLNT's competition here
MAT vs LTH Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while LTH trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check LTH's competition here
MAT vs GOLF Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while GOLF trades at $82.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check GOLF's competition here
MAT vs ELY Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check ELY's competition here
MAT vs YETI Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while YETI trades at $38.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check YETI's competition here
MAT vs SEAS Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check SEAS's competition here
MAT vs FUN Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while FUN trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check FUN's competition here
MAT vs PRKS Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while PRKS trades at $51.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check PRKS's competition here
MAT vs SIX Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check SIX's competition here
MAT vs VSTO Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check VSTO's competition here
MAT vs PTON Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while PTON trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check PTON's competition here
MAT vs OSW Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while OSW trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check OSW's competition here
MAT vs MODG Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while MODG trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check MODG's competition here
MAT vs LUCK Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while LUCK trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -150.86. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check LUCK's competition here
MAT vs GEAR Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check GEAR's competition here
MAT vs XPOF Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 522M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while XPOF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check XPOF's competition here
MAT vs JOUT Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while JOUT trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check JOUT's competition here
MAT vs CNXA Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check CNXA's competition here
MAT vs FNKO Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while FNKO trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check FNKO's competition here
MAT vs JAKK Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 213M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while JAKK trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check JAKK's competition here
MAT vs SRM Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while SRM trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRM's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check SRM's competition here
MAT vs ESCA Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while ESCA trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check ESCA's competition here
MAT vs PLBY Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while PLBY trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +286.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check PLBY's competition here
MAT vs CLAR Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while CLAR trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check CLAR's competition here
MAT vs AOUT Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while AOUT trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -968.00. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check AOUT's competition here
MAT vs DOGZ Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while DOGZ trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check DOGZ's competition here
MAT vs BTN Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check BTN's competition here
MAT vs YYAI Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while YYAI trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check YYAI's competition here
MAT vs ISPOW Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check ISPOW's competition here
MAT vs ISPO Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while ISPO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check ISPO's competition here
MAT vs AGH Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while AGH trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -117.50. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check AGH's competition here
MAT vs NLS Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check NLS's competition here
MAT vs FGH Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check FGH's competition here
MAT vs GDHG Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while GDHG trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check GDHG's competition here
MAT vs MMA Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while MMA trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check MMA's competition here
MAT vs HWH Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while HWH trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check HWH's competition here
MAT vs NWTG Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while NWTG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check NWTG's competition here
MAT vs FXLV Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while FXLV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check FXLV's competition here
MAT vs SPGC Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check SPGC's competition here
MAT vs BBIG Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check BBIG's competition here
MAT vs DS-PD Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check DS-PD's competition here
MAT vs BWL-A Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check BWL-A's competition here
MAT vs DS-PB Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check DS-PB's competition here
MAT vs DS Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check DS's competition here
MAT vs DVD Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check DVD's competition here
MAT vs DS-PC Comparison July 2025
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $17.43, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 11.32, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.Check DS-PC's competition here