McDonald's Corporation
McDonald's Corporation MCD Peers
See (MCD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCD | $307.29 | -0.55% | 219.7B | 27.10 | $11.34 | +2.27% |
| SBUX | $89.64 | +3.05% | 101.9B | 32.60 | $2.75 | +2.68% |
| CMG | $52.49 | -0.21% | 70.7B | 46.45 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $144.84 | +1.37% | 40.3B | 28.85 | $5.02 | +1.91% |
| DRI | $217.49 | +1.13% | 25.5B | 24.46 | $8.89 | +2.58% |
| QSR | $71.28 | -0.15% | 23.4B | 24.16 | $2.95 | +3.31% |
| YUMC | $43.09 | +0.21% | 16.1B | 18.03 | $2.39 | +1.87% |
| DPZ | $468.21 | +1.78% | 16B | 26.86 | $17.43 | +1.34% |
| TXRH | $195.19 | +1.83% | 12.9B | 30.12 | $6.48 | +1.64% |
| BROS | $73.08 | +0.09% | 12B | 187.39 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MCD vs SBUX Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while SBUX trades at $89.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CMG Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CMG trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs YUM Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while YUM trades at $144.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs DRI Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while DRI trades at $217.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs QSR Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while QSR trades at $71.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs YUMC Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while YUMC trades at $43.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs DPZ Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while DPZ trades at $468.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs TXRH Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while TXRH trades at $195.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BROS Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BROS trades at $73.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 187.39. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs WING Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while WING trades at $374.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 62.99. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CAVA Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CAVA trades at $79.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 65.84. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs EAT Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while EAT trades at $171.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs SHAK Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while SHAK trades at $129.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 445.38. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CAKE Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CAKE trades at $57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs WEN Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while WEN trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs SG Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while SG trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs PZZA Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while PZZA trades at $49.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs ARCO Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while ARCO trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs HDL Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while HDL trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CBRL Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CBRL trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CNNE Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CNNE trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BJRI Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 975.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BJRI trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 45.94. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs KRUS Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 952.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while KRUS trades at $78.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -87.58. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FWRG Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 910.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FWRG trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 87.82. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs TWNPV Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BH Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 811.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BH trades at $264.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BH-A Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 800.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BH-A trades at $1,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs PTLO Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while PTLO trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs RUTH Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CHUY Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BLMN Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 644.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BLMN trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs TAST Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs NATH Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while NATH trades at $108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs DIN Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 386.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while DIN trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs JACK Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 382.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while JACK trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs VENU Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while VENU trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs RICK Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 366.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while RICK trades at $41.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 48.47. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs LOCO Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 332.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while LOCO trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs PBPB Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while PBPB trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FRGI Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs DENN Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 206.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while DENN trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs TWNP Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while TWNP trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BBQ Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs MB Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while MB trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs RRGB Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while RRGB trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs STKS Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while STKS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs THCHW Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs THCH Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while THCH trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BDL Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BDL trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FATBW Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FATBW trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs GRIL Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FATAV Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FATBP Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FATBP trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FAT Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FAT trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FATBB Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FATBB trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs RAVE Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while RAVE trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs NDLS Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while NDLS trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs ARKR Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while ARKR trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs YOSH Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while YOSH trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs MYT Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs GENK Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while GENK trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -106.00. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs GTIM Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while GTIM trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs CHSN Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while CHSN trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs REBN Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while REBN trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs PC Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while PC trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BTBDW Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BTBDW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BTBD Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BTBD trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BTB Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs FATBV Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs PNST Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BFI Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs BFIIW Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs ONDR Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.
MCD vs LUB Comparison
MCD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCD stands at 219.7B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCD is priced at $307.29, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCD currently has a P/E ratio of 27.10, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCD's ROE is -1.89%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCD is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCD.