Missfresh Limited

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KR has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KR trades at $71.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KR's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KR's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while SFM trades at $161.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check SFM's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ACI trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ACI's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ASAI trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ASAI's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while WMK trades at $76.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check WMK's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while GO trades at $13.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GO's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to GO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check GO's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while IMKTA trades at $65.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check IMKTA's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 919.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while NGVC trades at $39.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check NGVC's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 754.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DNUT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DNUT's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 484.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DDL trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DDL's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while VLGEA trades at $35.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check VLGEA's competition here

MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while MSS trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to MSS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check MSS's competition here