Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMC | $208.32 | -0.71% | 102.4B | 25.00 | $8.33 | +1.60% |
| AJG | $309.06 | -0.56% | 79.1B | 47.76 | $6.47 | +0.80% |
| AON | $356.61 | -0.19% | 77B | 30.80 | $11.58 | +0.77% |
| BRO | $102.78 | -0.39% | 33.5B | 28.63 | $3.59 | +0.56% |
| WTW | $308.73 | -0.55% | 30.6B | -656.87 | -$0.47 | +1.16% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | +1.16% |
| ERIE | $366.94 | +0.43% | 16.9B | 31.20 | $11.76 | +1.47% |
| CRVL | $89.50 | -3.83% | 4.6B | 48.91 | $1.83 | N/A |
| BWIN | $40.27 | -2.33% | 2.7B | -75.98 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| BRP | $32.66 | +0.46% | 2.2B | -35.12 | -$0.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MMC vs AJG Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while AJG trades at $309.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 47.76. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check AJG's competition here
MMC vs AON Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while AON trades at $356.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check AON's competition here
MMC vs BRO Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while BRO trades at $102.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check BRO's competition here
MMC vs WTW Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while WTW trades at $308.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is -656.87. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check WTW's competition here
MMC vs WLTW Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WLTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check WLTW's competition here
MMC vs ERIE Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while ERIE trades at $366.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check ERIE's competition here
MMC vs CRVL Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while CRVL trades at $89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check CRVL's competition here
MMC vs BWIN Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while BWIN trades at $40.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -75.98. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check BWIN's competition here
MMC vs BRP Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check BRP's competition here
MMC vs CRD-A Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 519.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while CRD-A trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check CRD-A's competition here
MMC vs CRD-B Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 519.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while CRD-B trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check CRD-B's competition here
MMC vs TWFG Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 454.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while TWFG trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 113.04. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check TWFG's competition here
MMC vs SLQT Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 350.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while SLQT trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -40.60. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLQT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check SLQT's competition here
MMC vs TIRX Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while TIRX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check TIRX's competition here
MMC vs EHTH Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while EHTH trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check EHTH's competition here
MMC vs FANH Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check FANH's competition here
MMC vs GOCO Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while GOCO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -43.14. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check GOCO's competition here
MMC vs ZBAO Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while ZBAO trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check ZBAO's competition here
MMC vs RELIW Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while RELIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check RELIW's competition here
MMC vs RELI Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while RELI trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check RELI's competition here
MMC vs HUIZ Comparison July 2025
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 102.4B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $208.32, while HUIZ trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check HUIZ's competition here