Monster Beverage Corporation
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | $58.75 | -3.75% | 57.3B | 38.65 | $1.52 | N/A |
| KO | $67.89 | -1.25% | 292.3B | 24.09 | $2.82 | +2.92% |
| PEP | $137.92 | -3.46% | 188.8B | 25.08 | $5.50 | +3.89% |
| CCEP | $96.92 | -2.35% | 44.7B | 27.15 | $3.57 | +2.25% |
| KDP | $32.65 | -3.46% | 44.4B | 28.89 | $1.13 | +2.75% |
| KOF | $83.04 | -0.47% | 17.5B | 13.89 | $5.98 | +3.91% |
| CELH | $45.34 | -2.58% | 11.7B | 137.39 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $27.61 | -1.32% | 10.4B | -251.18 | -$0.11 | +4.29% |
| COKE | $111.75 | -2.53% | 9.7B | 16.65 | $6.71 | +0.88% |
| FIZZ | $45.82 | -1.93% | 4.3B | 23.03 | $1.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNST vs KO Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 292.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while KO trades at $67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KO's competition here
MNST vs PEP Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 188.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while PEP trades at $137.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PEP's competition here
MNST vs CCEP Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while CCEP trades at $96.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CCEP's competition here
MNST vs KDP Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while KDP trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KDP's competition here
MNST vs KOF Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while KOF trades at $83.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check KOF's competition here
MNST vs CELH Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while CELH trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 137.39. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check CELH's competition here
MNST vs PRMB Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while PRMB trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -251.18. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMB's competition here
MNST vs COKE Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while COKE trades at $111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COKE's competition here
MNST vs FIZZ Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while FIZZ trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check FIZZ's competition here
MNST vs PRMW Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check PRMW's competition here
MNST vs AKO-A Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while AKO-A trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-A's competition here
MNST vs AKO-B Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while AKO-B trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check AKO-B's competition here
MNST vs COCO Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while COCO trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check COCO's competition here
MNST vs OTLY Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 461.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while OTLY trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check OTLY's competition here
MNST vs ZVIA Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while ZVIA trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check ZVIA's competition here
MNST vs SHOT Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while SHOT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -15.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check SHOT's competition here
MNST vs REED Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while REED trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check REED's competition here
MNST vs BRFH Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while BRFH trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check BRFH's competition here
MNST vs WTER Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 227.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while WTER trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check WTER's competition here
MNST vs NBEV Comparison August 2025
MNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNST stands at 57.3B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MNST is priced at $58.75, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNST currently has a P/E ratio of 38.65, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MNST's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MNST is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNST.Check NBEV's competition here