Marti Technologies, Inc.
Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT | $2.44 | +0.00% | 186M | -1.95 | -$1.25 | N/A |
| SAP | $285.19 | +0.49% | 332.3B | 44.31 | $6.44 | +0.92% |
| CRM | $247.49 | -1.91% | 236.6B | 38.49 | $6.43 | +0.65% |
| INTU | $769.27 | -1.99% | 214.6B | 62.75 | $12.26 | +0.54% |
| NOW | $905.12 | -1.94% | 188.3B | 112.71 | $8.03 | N/A |
| UBER | $89.39 | +1.09% | 187B | 15.66 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $127.00 | +1.43% | 154.7B | 103.25 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $377.93 | -4.32% | 128B | 68.34 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $375.46 | -3.54% | 106.4B | 26.35 | $14.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $360.50 | -1.20% | 98.2B | 97.17 | $3.71 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MRT vs SAP Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SAP trades at $285.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 44.31. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SAP's competition here
MRT vs CRM Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 236.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CRM trades at $247.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CRM's competition here
MRT vs INTU Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while INTU trades at $769.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check INTU's competition here
MRT vs NOW Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 188.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while NOW trades at $905.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 112.71. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check NOW's competition here
MRT vs UBER Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 187B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while UBER trades at $89.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check UBER's competition here
MRT vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SHOP trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SHOP's competition here
MRT vs APP Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while APP trades at $377.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 68.34. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check APP's competition here
MRT vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while MSTR trades at $375.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check MSTR's competition here
MRT vs CDNS Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CDNS trades at $360.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 97.17. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CDNS's competition here
MRT vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SNOW trades at $205.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SNOW's competition here
MRT vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ADSK trades at $299.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 64.21. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ADSK's competition here
MRT vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while WDAY trades at $224.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 124.99. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check WDAY's competition here
MRT vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while TEAM trades at $185.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -112.39. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check TEAM's competition here
MRT vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DDOG trades at $132.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 282.85. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DDOG's competition here
MRT vs TTD Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while TTD trades at $87.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 106.95. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check TTD's competition here
MRT vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ANSS's competition here
MRT vs FICO Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while FICO trades at $1,343.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 52.56. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check FICO's competition here
MRT vs STRF Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while STRF trades at $116.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check STRF's competition here
MRT vs STRK Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while STRK trades at $106.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check STRK's competition here
MRT vs TYL Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while TYL trades at $608.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 87.21. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check TYL's competition here
MRT vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while HUBS trades at $492.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1094.38. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check HUBS's competition here
MRT vs PTC Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PTC trades at $214.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.66. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PTC's competition here
MRT vs ZM Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ZM trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ZM's competition here
MRT vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SSNC trades at $85.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SSNC's competition here
MRT vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while GRAB trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 248.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check GRAB's competition here
MRT vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while GWRE trades at $223.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 518.77. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check GWRE's competition here
MRT vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check AZPN's competition here
MRT vs BSY Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BSY trades at $57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 73.14. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BSY's competition here
MRT vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DUOL trades at $340.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 166.82. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DUOL's competition here
MRT vs DT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DT trades at $50.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DT's competition here
MRT vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DOCU trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DOCU's competition here
MRT vs U Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while U trades at $33.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas U's P/E ratio is -30.30. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check U's competition here
MRT vs MANH Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while MANH trades at $215.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 60.27. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check MANH's competition here
MRT vs QXO Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while QXO trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -55.51. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check QXO's competition here
MRT vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PAYC trades at $223.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PAYC's competition here
MRT vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while MNDY trades at $249.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 249.96. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check MNDY's competition here
MRT vs BKI Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BKI's competition here
MRT vs APPF Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while APPF trades at $313.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 56.52. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check APPF's competition here
MRT vs XM Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check XM's competition here
MRT vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CDAY's competition here
MRT vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while TTAN trades at $111.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -30.05. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check TTAN's competition here
MRT vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PCTY trades at $181.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PCTY's competition here
MRT vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PEGA trades at $57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 46.80. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PEGA's competition here
MRT vs NICE Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while NICE trades at $153.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check NICE's competition here
MRT vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PCOR trades at $64.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -66.81. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PCOR's competition here
MRT vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DSGX trades at $107.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 65.23. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DSGX's competition here
MRT vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SRAD trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 139.20. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SRAD's competition here
MRT vs DAY Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DAY trades at $53.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 332.75. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DAY's competition here
MRT vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ESTC trades at $80.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -77.01. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ESTC's competition here
MRT vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CVLT trades at $183.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 101.81. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CVLT's competition here
MRT vs NATI Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check NATI's competition here
MRT vs SMAR Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SMAR's competition here
MRT vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while OTEX trades at $28.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check OTEX's competition here
MRT vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while GTLB trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 440.00. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check GTLB's competition here
MRT vs BULL Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BULL trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BULL's competition here
MRT vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while IDCC trades at $269.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check IDCC's competition here
MRT vs COUP Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check COUP's competition here
MRT vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while LYFT trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 96.73. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check LYFT's competition here
MRT vs LIF Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while LIF trades at $75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 583.46. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check LIF's competition here
MRT vs CWAN Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CWAN trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CWAN's competition here
MRT vs VERX Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while VERX trades at $33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -114.03. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check VERX's competition here
MRT vs FROG Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while FROG trades at $42.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -59.61. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check FROG's competition here
MRT vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while QTWO trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1282.58. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check QTWO's competition here
MRT vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while SOUN trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check SOUN's competition here
MRT vs WK Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while WK trades at $78.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -66.22. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check WK's competition here
MRT vs BILL Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BILL trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2087.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BILL's competition here
MRT vs COMP Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while COMP trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -82.40. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check COMP's competition here
MRT vs CVT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CVT's competition here
MRT vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while RIOT trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -27.82. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check RIOT's competition here
MRT vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PYCR's competition here
MRT vs ETWO-WT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ETWO-WT's competition here
MRT vs FRSH Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while FRSH trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -74.78. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check FRSH's competition here
MRT vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PWSC's competition here
MRT vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ZETA trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -63.56. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ZETA's competition here
MRT vs CALX Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CALX trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -137.78. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CALX's competition here
MRT vs RUM Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while RUM trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check RUM's competition here
MRT vs AYX Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check AYX's competition here
MRT vs ENV Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ENV's competition here
MRT vs GRND Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while GRND trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.64. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check GRND's competition here
MRT vs INST Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check INST's competition here
MRT vs ZI Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ZI's competition here
MRT vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while RUMBW trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check RUMBW's competition here
MRT vs BL Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BL trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BL's competition here
MRT vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ASAN trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ASAN's competition here
MRT vs INTA Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while INTA trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -168.75. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check INTA's competition here
MRT vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while AGYS trades at $114.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 234.67. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check AGYS's competition here
MRT vs DAVEW Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DAVEW trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DAVEW's competition here
MRT vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DAVE trades at $238.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 63.52. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DAVE's competition here
MRT vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while NCNO trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -105.13. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check NCNO's competition here
MRT vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while GBTG trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -65.05. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check GBTG's competition here
MRT vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BLKB trades at $63.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BLKB's competition here
MRT vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while CLSK trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check CLSK's competition here
MRT vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BRZE trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -26.71. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BRZE's competition here
MRT vs YOU Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while YOU trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check YOU's competition here
MRT vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while ALRM trades at $55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check ALRM's competition here
MRT vs DCT Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DCT's competition here
MRT vs DV Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while DV trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check DV's competition here
MRT vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while BTDR trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check BTDR's competition here
MRT vs PAR Comparison August 2025
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 186M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.44, while PAR trades at $59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.Check PAR's competition here