Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley MS-PA Peers
See (MS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-PA | $22.07 | -0.85% | 206B | 2.81 | $7.86 | +2.80% |
| MS | $131.80 | +0.90% | 211.4B | 15.45 | $8.53 | +2.80% |
| MS-PK | $23.19 | -0.07% | 207.2B | 2.95 | $7.86 | +2.80% |
| MS-PI | $24.92 | -0.16% | 207B | 3.17 | $7.86 | +2.80% |
| MS-PF | $25.36 | +0.19% | 206.5B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +2.80% |
| MS-PE | $25.48 | +0.04% | 206.3B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.80% |
| GS | $613.83 | +1.31% | 188.3B | 14.26 | $43.05 | +1.95% |
| GS-PA | $21.29 | -0.37% | 186B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.95% |
| GS-PD | $21.05 | -0.51% | 184.9B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.95% |
| GS-PC | $21.43 | -1.06% | 183.4B | 1.71 | $12.53 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
MS-PA vs MS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 211.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS trades at $131.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 207.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PK trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 207B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PI trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PF trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 206.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PE trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 188.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GS trades at $613.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GS-PA trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GS-PD trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GS-PC trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCHW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SCHW trades at $88.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs IBKR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while IBKR trades at $211.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PP trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PQ trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while TW trades at $140.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 57.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PL trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LPLA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while LPLA trades at $388.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs RJF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while RJF trades at $146.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MS-PO trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs NMR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while NMR trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FUTU Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while FUTU trades at $106.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HLI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while HLI trades at $177.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs JEF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while JEF trades at $52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs XP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while XP trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SF trades at $96.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SF-PB trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs EVR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while EVR trades at $245.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FRHC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while FRHC trades at $155.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MKTX Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MKTX trades at $222.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MARA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MARA trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs RJF-PB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while RJF-PB trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BGC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while BGC trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PIPR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while PIPR trades at $264.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MC trades at $59.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LAZ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while LAZ trades at $44.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SNEX Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SNEX trades at $85.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PJT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while PJT trades at $154.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs VIRT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while VIRT trades at $41.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MRX Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MRX trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs IREN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while IREN trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -31.45. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SF-PC trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HUT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while HUT trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SF-PD trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BGCP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs WULF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while WULF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PWP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while PWP trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -88.81. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs DFIN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while DFIN trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HKIB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TIGR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while TIGR trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs CIFR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while CIFR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while CIFRW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs COWN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs AC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 804.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while AC trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs OPY Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 660.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while OPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FUFU Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 574.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while FUFU trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 352.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BTBT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 548.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while BTBT trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs AMRK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 515.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while AMRK trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 501.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while FUFUW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BITF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 498.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while BITF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HIVE Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while HIVE trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -40.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BTM Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while BTM trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -31.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GHL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MFH Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MFH trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -52.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SIEB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SIEB trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PROP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while PROP trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs WHG Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while WHG trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 383.25. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while CLSKW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SRL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SRL trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TCJH Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GRYP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GRYP trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SWIN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SWIN trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HGBL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while HGBL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GRDI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BTCS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while BTCS trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TOP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while TOP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SDIG Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MDBH Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MDBH trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PLUT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while PLUT trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -49.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs ARBK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while ARBK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GSIW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GSIW trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GREE Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GREE trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SAI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs COHN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while COHN trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs WAI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while WAI trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs ABTS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while ABTS trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MIGI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MIGI trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs ATIF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs NCPL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while NCPL trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MEGL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while MEGL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs NCPLW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LGHLW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GRDIW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SAITW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LGHL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 206B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 609.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $22.07, while LGHL trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.81, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.