ArcelorMittal S.A.

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while NUE trades at $145.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check NUE's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while STLD trades at $130.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check STLD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while PKX trades at $60.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check PKX's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while RS trades at $306.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check RS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while X trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check X's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while TX trades at $31.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -17.63. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check TX's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while CMC trades at $53.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 177.73. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check CMC's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while GGB trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check GGB's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while CLF trades at $11.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check CLF's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while SID trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SID's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while WS trades at $31.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check WS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while SIM trades at $27.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SIM's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while SCHN trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SCHN's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while TMST trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check TMST's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while RDUS trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check RDUS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 714M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while MTUS trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -34.67. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTUS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 653.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while ASTL trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ASTL's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while USAP trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check USAP's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while MSB trades at $29.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MSB's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while ZEUS trades at $33.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ZEUS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while SYNL trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SYNL's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while ACNT trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ACNT's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while LUD trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -281.50. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check LUD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while FRD trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check FRD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while KBSX trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check KBSX's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while HLP trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check HLP's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while ASTLW trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ASTLW's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while HUDI trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check HUDI's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while ZKIN trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ZKIN's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while INHD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check INHD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while MTL trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTL's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while OSN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check OSN's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $33.65, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.44, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTL-P's competition here