Nano Labs Ltd
Nano Labs Ltd (NA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | $7.26 | -8.10% | 488.8M | -3.70 | -$1.96 | N/A |
| NVDA | $173.50 | -0.14% | 4.2T | 55.78 | $3.11 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $290.18 | +0.51% | 1.4T | 105.91 | $2.74 | +0.79% |
| TSM | $245.60 | +1.66% | 1.3T | 28.97 | $8.48 | +1.06% |
| ASML | $711.25 | -1.91% | 279.7B | 25.31 | $28.10 | +0.92% |
| AMD | $166.47 | +2.68% | 269.9B | 120.63 | $1.38 | N/A |
| QCOM | $158.40 | -0.28% | 173.9B | 16.16 | $9.80 | +2.17% |
| ARM | $163.17 | +1.99% | 172.5B | 217.56 | $0.75 | N/A |
| TXN | $184.99 | -0.38% | 168.1B | 35.10 | $5.27 | +2.91% |
| AMAT | $185.69 | -1.29% | 149B | 22.59 | $8.22 | +0.90% |
Stock Comparison
NA vs NVDA Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while NVDA trades at $173.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 55.78. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check NVDA's competition here
NA vs AVGO Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AVGO trades at $290.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 105.91. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AVGO's competition here
NA vs TSM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while TSM trades at $245.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check TSM's competition here
NA vs ASML Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 279.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ASML trades at $711.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ASML's competition here
NA vs AMD Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 269.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AMD trades at $166.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 120.63. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AMD's competition here
NA vs QCOM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while QCOM trades at $158.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check QCOM's competition here
NA vs ARM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ARM trades at $163.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 217.56. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ARM's competition here
NA vs TXN Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while TXN trades at $184.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check TXN's competition here
NA vs AMAT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AMAT trades at $185.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AMAT's competition here
NA vs MU Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MU trades at $111.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MU's competition here
NA vs LRCX Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while LRCX trades at $96.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check LRCX's competition here
NA vs KLAC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while KLAC trades at $902.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check KLAC's competition here
NA vs ADI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ADI trades at $227.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 62.08. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ADI's competition here
NA vs INTC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while INTC trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check INTC's competition here
NA vs MRVL Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MRVL trades at $74.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -130.19. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MRVL's competition here
NA vs NXPI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while NXPI trades at $223.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check NXPI's competition here
NA vs MCHP Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MCHP trades at $69.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6921.00. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MCHP's competition here
NA vs MPWR Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MPWR trades at $714.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MPWR's competition here
NA vs ON Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ON trades at $56.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ON's competition here
NA vs STM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while STM trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to STM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check STM's competition here
NA vs ASX Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ASX trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ASX's competition here
NA vs GFS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while GFS trades at $39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -117.59. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check GFS's competition here
NA vs ALAB Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ALAB trades at $122.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 93.31. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ALAB's competition here
NA vs UMC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while UMC trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check UMC's competition here
NA vs TER Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while TER trades at $90.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check TER's competition here
NA vs ENTG Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ENTG trades at $91.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 44.99. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ENTG's competition here
NA vs SWKS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SWKS trades at $71.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SWKS's competition here
NA vs MTSI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MTSI trades at $137.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.70. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MTSI's competition here
NA vs CREE Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check CREE's competition here
NA vs QRVO Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while QRVO trades at $85.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 147.02. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check QRVO's competition here
NA vs BRKS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check BRKS's competition here
NA vs NVMI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while NVMI trades at $258.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check NVMI's competition here
NA vs LSCC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while LSCC trades at $53.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 145.38. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check LSCC's competition here
NA vs OLED Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while OLED trades at $149.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check OLED's competition here
NA vs RMBS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while RMBS trades at $62.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check RMBS's competition here
NA vs ALGM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ALGM trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -86.44. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ALGM's competition here
NA vs TSEM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while TSEM trades at $47.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check TSEM's competition here
NA vs AMKR Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AMKR trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AMKR's competition here
NA vs CRUS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while CRUS trades at $101.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check CRUS's competition here
NA vs ONTO Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ONTO trades at $99.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ONTO's competition here
NA vs SITM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SITM trades at $190.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -50.17. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SITM's competition here
NA vs SMTC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SMTC trades at $53.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -31.59. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SMTC's competition here
NA vs SLAB Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SLAB trades at $134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -26.42. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SLAB's competition here
NA vs CAMT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while CAMT trades at $95.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check CAMT's competition here
NA vs IPGP Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while IPGP trades at $78.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -17.26. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check IPGP's competition here
NA vs POWI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while POWI trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check POWI's competition here
NA vs AMBA Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AMBA trades at $67.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -27.04. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AMBA's competition here
NA vs FORM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while FORM trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check FORM's competition here
NA vs SYNA Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SYNA trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SYNA's competition here
NA vs SIMO Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SIMO trades at $72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SIMO's competition here
NA vs ACLS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ACLS trades at $73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ACLS's competition here
NA vs DIOD Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while DIOD trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 91.85. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check DIOD's competition here
NA vs VSH Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while VSH trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -35.41. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check VSH's competition here
NA vs ACMR Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ACMR trades at $29.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ACMR's competition here
NA vs KLIC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while KLIC trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 91.89. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check KLIC's competition here
NA vs NVTS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while NVTS trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check NVTS's competition here
NA vs DQ Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while DQ trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check DQ's competition here
NA vs AAOI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AAOI trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AAOI's competition here
NA vs MXL Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MXL trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MXL's competition here
NA vs VECO Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while VECO trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check VECO's competition here
NA vs PLAB Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while PLAB trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check PLAB's competition here
NA vs SGH Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SGH's competition here
NA vs UCTT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while UCTT trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 38.65. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check UCTT's competition here
NA vs LASR Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 958.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while LASR trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -17.01. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check LASR's competition here
NA vs COHU Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 885.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while COHU trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check COHU's competition here
NA vs INDI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 814.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while INDI trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check INDI's competition here
NA vs AOSL Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 812.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AOSL trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -35.44. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AOSL's competition here
NA vs ICHR Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 704.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ICHR trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -43.96. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ICHR's competition here
NA vs AEHR Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AEHR trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -167.23. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AEHR's competition here
NA vs IMOS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while IMOS trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check IMOS's competition here
NA vs CEVA Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 553.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while CEVA trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 257.22. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check CEVA's competition here
NA vs POET Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while POET trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check POET's competition here
NA vs SKYT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 482.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while SKYT trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -59.06. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check SKYT's competition here
NA vs LAES Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 460.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while LAES trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check LAES's competition here
NA vs BZAI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 440.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while BZAI trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check BZAI's competition here
NA vs HIMX Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 417.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while HIMX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check HIMX's competition here
NA vs ALMU Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 372.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ALMU trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -90.73. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ALMU's competition here
NA vs AIP Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AIP trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AIP's competition here
NA vs XPER Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 344.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while XPER trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -17.53. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check XPER's competition here
NA vs VLN Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 329.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while VLN trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check VLN's competition here
NA vs TGAN Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check TGAN's competition here
NA vs NVEC Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while NVEC trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check NVEC's competition here
NA vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while VLN-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check VLN-WT's competition here
NA vs WOLF Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while WOLF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check WOLF's competition here
NA vs ATOM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 162.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ATOM trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ATOM's competition here
NA vs MX Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 149.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MX trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MX's competition here
NA vs OIIM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check OIIM's competition here
NA vs MRAM Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MRAM trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MRAM's competition here
NA vs GSIT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 136.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while GSIT trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check GSIT's competition here
NA vs AXTI Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while AXTI trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check AXTI's competition here
NA vs QUIK Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while QUIK trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check QUIK's competition here
NA vs INTT Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while INTT trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -768.00. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check INTT's competition here
NA vs ICG Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ICG trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ICG's competition here
NA vs GCTS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while GCTS trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check GCTS's competition here
NA vs ASYS Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while ASYS trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check ASYS's competition here
NA vs PXLW Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while PXLW trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check PXLW's competition here
NA vs MOSY Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MOSY's competition here
NA vs WISA Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check WISA's competition here
NA vs MOBXW Comparison July 2025
NA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA stands at 488.8M. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NA is priced at $7.26, while MOBXW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA's ROE is N/A, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NA is less volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.Check MOBXW's competition here