Novozymes A/S
Novozymes A/S NVZMF Peers
See (NVZMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVZMF | $72.10 | N/A | 33.6B | 63.25 | $1.14 | +1.26% |
| AIQUY | $40.67 | -0.76% | 117.3B | 30.81 | $1.32 | +1.79% |
| AIQUF | $203.16 | -0.70% | 117.2B | 30.83 | $6.59 | +1.83% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | N/A | 48.4B | -509.09 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| GVDBF | $5,008.62 | -5.05% | 46.2B | 35.07 | $142.82 | +1.58% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | N/A | 45.6B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | +0.07% |
| GVDNY | $97.28 | -2.33% | 44.9B | 33.78 | $2.88 | +1.60% |
| SKFOF | $269.22 | -0.84% | 43.2B | 28.22 | $9.54 | +0.76% |
| SXYAY | $26.74 | -2.12% | 42.9B | 28.15 | $0.95 | +1.72% |
| AKZOY | $23.11 | -0.39% | 35.5B | 22.01 | $1.05 | +3.21% |
Stock Comparison
NVZMF vs AIQUY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AIQUY trades at $40.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs AIQUF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AIQUF trades at $203.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs PTCAY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -509.09. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs GVDBF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while GVDBF trades at $5,008.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs PTPIF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs GVDNY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while GVDNY trades at $97.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SKFOF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SKFOF trades at $269.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SXYAY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SXYAY trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs AKZOY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AKZOY trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NVZMY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NVZMY trades at $71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 63.67. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs EMSHF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while EMSHF trades at $771.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NPCPF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NPCPF trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SYIEF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SYIEF trades at $120.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SYIEY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SYIEY trades at $27.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs COVTY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while COVTY trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NDEKF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NDEKF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CVVTF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs AKZOF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AKZOF trades at $65.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CRTSF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CHYHY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs BNTGF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while BNTGF trades at $71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs EVKIF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while EVKIF trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs EVKIY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while EVKIY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs BNTGY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while BNTGY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SCVUF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs IMDZF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while IMDZF trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs FUPBY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while FUPBY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ASGLF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs FUPPF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ASGLY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ASGLY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -13.44. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs OCLDY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while OCLDY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 103.33. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs COIHF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while COIHF trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SCVPY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TKCBY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs COIHY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while COIHY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ARKAY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ARKAY trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ARKAF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ARKAF trades at $69.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs FUPEF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while FUPEF trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NDEKY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NDEKY trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs OCLDF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs MITUF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while MITUF trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs KDSKF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs MITUY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while MITUY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs JMPLF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while JMPLF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs JMPLY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while JMPLY trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs AZLGF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AZLGF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CLZNF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs WKCMF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while WKCMF trades at $72.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CLZNY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CLZNY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NOFCF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs HXXPY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ICPVF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SASOF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SASOF trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs HXPLF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while HXPLF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs MBGCF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while MBGCF trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs KPTCY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while KPTCY trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs INCZY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs KSANF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs AWTRF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs LNXSY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while LNXSY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TKKYY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs LNXSF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while LNXSF trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -15.34. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs DACHF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while DACHF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs IRLCF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ZEOOY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs KPLIF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs OCINF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while OCINF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ZEOOF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs BRRDF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs KANKF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ALZCF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ALZCF trades at $148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TKYMY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ELKEF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ELKEF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CSNVY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CSNVY trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TKCBF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CSNVF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CSNVF trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs HUABF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ALPKF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ALPKF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -28.38. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs CUYRF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs EMNSF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TKYMF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs LNTEF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs ELMTY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs VTXPF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 998.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while VTXPF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs HUIHY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs AECLY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SKKAF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs HASGF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs DALQF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SYCHF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs VBVBF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 720M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs DLNDY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while DLNDY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TYOBY Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs FPLSF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 562.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while FPLSF trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NOPMF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 411.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NOPMF trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -26.59. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs TNMAF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is less volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs FLRAF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 388.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while FLRAF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs NCRBF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.
NVZMF vs SYYYF Comparison
NVZMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVZMF stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVZMF is priced at $72.10, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVZMF currently has a P/E ratio of 63.25, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, NVZMF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVZMF is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVZMF.