Okmin Resources, Inc.
Okmin Resources, Inc. (OKMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OKMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OKMN | $0.03 | +6.67% | 3.8M | -3.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PCCYF | $0.97 | -1.02% | 214.8B | 7.46 | $0.13 | +6.76% |
| RYDAF | $36.15 | +0.00% | 211.3B | 16.14 | $2.24 | +3.93% |
| TTFNF | $61.78 | +0.08% | 136.1B | 11.19 | $5.52 | +5.76% |
| BPAQF | $5.66 | -0.88% | 88.2B | 142.50 | $0.04 | +5.63% |
| SNPMF | $0.55 | -3.08% | 87.4B | 9.21 | $0.06 | +7.21% |
| OMVKY | $13.55 | -0.66% | 71.3B | 18.42 | $0.74 | +9.69% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $24.94 | -1.20% | 63.2B | 8.26 | $3.02 | +10.73% |
| EIPAF | $18.49 | +16.66% | 54.4B | 21.50 | $0.86 | +4.46% |
Stock Comparison
OKMN vs PCCYF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 214.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PCCYF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PCCYF's competition here
OKMN vs RYDAF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 211.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while RYDAF trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check RYDAF's competition here
OKMN vs TTFNF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while TTFNF trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check TTFNF's competition here
OKMN vs BPAQF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while BPAQF trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check BPAQF's competition here
OKMN vs SNPMF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while SNPMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SNPMF's competition here
OKMN vs OMVKY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while OMVKY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and OMVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OMVKY's competition here
OKMN vs RNFTF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and RNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNFTF's competition here
OKMN vs STOHF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while STOHF trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and STOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOHF's competition here
OKMN vs EIPAF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while EIPAF trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and EIPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIPAF's competition here
OKMN vs LUKOY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check LUKOY's competition here
OKMN vs PETFF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and PETFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PETFF's competition here
OKMN vs PUTRY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PUTRY's competition here
OKMN vs PUTRF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PUTRF's competition here
OKMN vs GLPEY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while GLPEY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check GLPEY's competition here
OKMN vs PSKOF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PSKOF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PSKOF's competition here
OKMN vs OMVJF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while OMVJF trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OMVJF's competition here
OKMN vs REPYY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while REPYY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check REPYY's competition here
OKMN vs REPYF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while REPYF trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check REPYF's competition here
OKMN vs OGFGY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while OGFGY trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OGFGY's competition here
OKMN vs OGFGF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while OGFGF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OGFGF's competition here
OKMN vs GLPEF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while GLPEF trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check GLPEF's competition here
OKMN vs MGYOY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while MGYOY trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check MGYOY's competition here
OKMN vs OAOFY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and OAOFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OAOFY's competition here
OKMN vs SLTQY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SLTQY's competition here
OKMN vs HLPMF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check HLPMF's competition here
OKMN vs ISRMF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check ISRMF's competition here
OKMN vs RTEXF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and RTEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTEXF's competition here
OKMN vs WDGJY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and WDGJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WDGJY's competition here
OKMN vs UNTC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while UNTC trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check UNTC's competition here
OKMN vs WDGJF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 247.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while WDGJF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check WDGJF's competition here
OKMN vs PXPEF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and PXPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXPEF's competition here
OKMN vs SEGYY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SEGYY's competition here
OKMN vs ECTM Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while ECTM trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check ECTM's competition here
OKMN vs UNTCW Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while UNTCW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and UNTCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNTCW's competition here
OKMN vs GRGUF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and GRGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRGUF's competition here
OKMN vs POGS Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while POGS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check POGS's competition here
OKMN vs AEDC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check AEDC's competition here
OKMN vs TRNX Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and TRNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRNX's competition here
OKMN vs PEMC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 29K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and PEMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEMC's competition here
OKMN vs SNVP Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SNVP's competition here
OKMN vs FRMC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check FRMC's competition here
OKMN vs PGAS Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and PGAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGAS's competition here
OKMN vs BNXR Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and BNXR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNXR's competition here
OKMN vs AMNE Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check AMNE's competition here
OKMN vs NUSPQ Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check NUSPQ's competition here
OKMN vs RRRI Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check RRRI's competition here
OKMN vs SGTZY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and SGTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGTZY's competition here
OKMN vs OJSCY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and OJSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OJSCY's competition here
OKMN vs SNPTY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SNPTY's competition here
OKMN vs POGWY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and POGWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POGWY's competition here
OKMN vs VCOGF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 3.8M. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.03, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN and VCOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCOGF's competition here