Ooma, Inc.
Ooma, Inc. (OOMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OOMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOMA | $11.94 | -0.83% | 329.8M | -62.89 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| TMUS | $243.55 | -1.60% | 274.1B | 23.00 | $10.59 | +1.35% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.00 | +0.29% | 201.6B | 16.01 | $1.75 | +3.95% |
| TBB | $22.41 | +0.18% | 200.9B | 4.38 | $5.12 | +5.98% |
| VZ | $43.08 | +0.00% | 181.7B | 10.02 | $4.30 | +6.30% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
| T-PA | $20.21 | +0.20% | 145.4B | 8.50 | $2.38 | +3.95% |
| T-PC | $19.29 | +0.10% | 138.7B | 8.11 | $2.38 | +3.95% |
| CMCSA | $33.68 | -4.78% | 125.4B | 8.30 | $4.06 | +3.79% |
Stock Comparison
OOMA vs TMUS Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 274.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TMUS trades at $243.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TMUS's competition here
OOMA vs VZA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VZA's competition here
OOMA vs T Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while T trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check T's competition here
OOMA vs TBB Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TBB trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TBB's competition here
OOMA vs VZ Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while VZ trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VZ's competition here
OOMA vs TBC Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TBC's competition here
OOMA vs T-PA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while T-PA trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check T-PA's competition here
OOMA vs T-PC Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 138.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while T-PC trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check T-PC's competition here
OOMA vs CMCSA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CMCSA trades at $33.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CMCSA's competition here
OOMA vs AMOV Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check AMOV's competition here
OOMA vs AMX Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while AMX trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check AMX's competition here
OOMA vs CHTR Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CHTR trades at $309.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CHTR's competition here
OOMA vs CHT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CHT trades at $43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CHT's competition here
OOMA vs TEF Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TEF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -49.09. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TEF's competition here
OOMA vs ORAN Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ORAN's competition here
OOMA vs VOD Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while VOD trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VOD's competition here
OOMA vs TU Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TU trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TU's competition here
OOMA vs BCE Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while BCE trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 78.06. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check BCE's competition here
OOMA vs RCI Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while RCI trades at $34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RCI's competition here
OOMA vs VIV Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while VIV trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VIV's competition here
OOMA vs TLK Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TLK trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TLK's competition here
OOMA vs SJR Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SJR's competition here
OOMA vs LBRDP Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBRDP trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBRDP's competition here
OOMA vs KT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while KT trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KT's competition here
OOMA vs LBRDA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBRDA trades at $70.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBRDA's competition here
OOMA vs LBRDK Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBRDK trades at $70.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBRDK's competition here
OOMA vs MBT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MBT's competition here
OOMA vs FYBR Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while FYBR trades at $36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check FYBR's competition here
OOMA vs TIMB Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TIMB trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TIMB's competition here
OOMA vs SKM Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while SKM trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SKM's competition here
OOMA vs CTDD Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CTDD trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CTDD's competition here
OOMA vs TIGO Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TIGO trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TIGO's competition here
OOMA vs USM Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while USM trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -160.85. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check USM's competition here
OOMA vs UZF Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while UZF trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZF's competition here
OOMA vs UZE Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while UZE trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZE's competition here
OOMA vs UZD Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while UZD trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZD's competition here
OOMA vs PHI Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while PHI trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check PHI's competition here
OOMA vs TKC Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TKC trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TKC's competition here
OOMA vs CTBB Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CTBB trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CTBB's competition here
OOMA vs LUMN Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LUMN trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LUMN's competition here
OOMA vs TDS Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TDS trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDS's competition here
OOMA vs TDS-PU Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TDS-PU trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDS-PU's competition here
OOMA vs LBYKV Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBYKV's competition here
OOMA vs TDS-PV Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TDS-PV trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDS-PV's competition here
OOMA vs SNRE Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while SNRE trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SNRE's competition here
OOMA vs VEON Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while VEON trades at $54.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VEON's competition here
OOMA vs LBTYB Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBTYB trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -16.65. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBTYB's competition here
OOMA vs LBTYA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBTYA trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBTYA's competition here
OOMA vs LBTYK Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBTYK trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBTYK's competition here
OOMA vs GSAT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while GSAT trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -39.61. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GSAT's competition here
OOMA vs DISH Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check DISH's competition here
OOMA vs IRDM Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while IRDM trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IRDM's competition here
OOMA vs TEO Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TEO trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TEO's competition here
OOMA vs CCOI Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CCOI trades at $48.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CCOI's competition here
OOMA vs GOGO Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while GOGO trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -394.50. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GOGO's competition here
OOMA vs IHS Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while IHS trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -47.42. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IHS's competition here
OOMA vs ASTSW Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ASTSW's competition here
OOMA vs RADI Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RADI's competition here
OOMA vs IDT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while IDT trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IDT's competition here
OOMA vs LILA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LILA trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LILA's competition here
OOMA vs LILAK Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LILAK trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LILAK's competition here
OOMA vs TV Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TV trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TV's competition here
OOMA vs ATUS Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ATUS trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ATUS's competition here
OOMA vs SHEN Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while SHEN trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SHEN's competition here
OOMA vs CABO Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 811.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CABO trades at $144.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CABO's competition here
OOMA vs RBBN Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 675.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while RBBN trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RBBN's competition here
OOMA vs CNSL Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CNSL's competition here
OOMA vs ATEX Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 396.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ATEX trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -34.75. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ATEX's competition here
OOMA vs WOW Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 311.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while WOW trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check WOW's competition here
OOMA vs HCHC Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check HCHC's competition here
OOMA vs ATNI Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ATNI trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ATNI's competition here
OOMA vs RDCM Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while RDCM trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RDCM's competition here
OOMA vs CXDO Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CXDO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 73.63. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CXDO's competition here
OOMA vs FNGR Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while FNGR trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check FNGR's competition here
OOMA vs MTSL Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MTSL's competition here
OOMA vs TDI Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TDI trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDI's competition here
OOMA vs KORE Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while KORE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KORE's competition here
OOMA vs IQST Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while IQST trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IQST's competition here
OOMA vs PCLA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while PCLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check PCLA's competition here
OOMA vs ANTE Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ANTE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ANTE's competition here
OOMA vs UCL Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while UCL trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UCL's competition here
OOMA vs SIFY Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while SIFY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SIFY's competition here
OOMA vs MIMO Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MIMO's competition here
OOMA vs QTEKW Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check QTEKW's competition here
OOMA vs QTEK Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check QTEK's competition here
OOMA vs COMSP Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check COMSP's competition here
OOMA vs COMSW Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check COMSW's competition here
OOMA vs UZA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZA's competition here
OOMA vs MIMO-WT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MIMO-WT's competition here
OOMA vs TDA Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDA's competition here
OOMA vs STRY Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check STRY's competition here
OOMA vs CBB Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CBB's competition here
OOMA vs OIBR-C Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check OIBR-C's competition here
OOMA vs LBYAV Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBYAV's competition here
OOMA vs TIGOR Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TIGOR's competition here
OOMA vs GTT Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GTT's competition here
OOMA vs LORL Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LORL's competition here
OOMA vs ALSK Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ALSK's competition here
OOMA vs PTNR Comparison July 2025
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 329.8M. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $11.94, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of -62.89, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check PTNR's competition here