Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Ormat Technologies, Inc. ORA Peers
See (ORA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORA | $77.80 | +3.57% | 4.7B | 37.77 | $2.06 | +0.62% |
| GEV | $485.00 | +0.14% | 132.4B | 70.49 | $6.88 | +0.10% |
| CEG | $298.80 | +3.08% | 93.6B | 31.52 | $9.48 | +0.50% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +5.28% |
| BEP | $23.98 | +0.57% | 6.8B | -23.74 | -$1.01 | +6.10% |
| BEP-PA | $17.02 | -0.68% | 6.8B | -33.31 | -$0.51 | +6.10% |
| CWEN | $30.51 | +0.76% | 6.1B | 38.14 | $0.80 | +5.63% |
| CWEN-A | $28.53 | +0.94% | 6.1B | 35.66 | $0.80 | +5.63% |
| SMR | $34.38 | +10.72% | 4.6B | -25.09 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| AQN | $5.86 | +0.34% | 4.5B | 20.93 | $0.28 | +5.18% |
Stock Comparison
ORA vs GEV Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while GEV trades at $485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 70.49. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs CEG Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while CEG trades at $298.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs AQNU Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs BEP Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while BEP trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -23.74. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs BEP-PA Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while BEP-PA trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -33.31. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs CWEN Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while CWEN trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs CWEN-A Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while CWEN-A trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 35.66. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs SMR Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while SMR trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -25.09. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs AQN Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while AQN trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs BEPC Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while BEPC trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -21.30. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs EE Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while EE trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs AY Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs RNWWW Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while RNWWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs SMR-WT Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs RNW Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while RNW trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 138.00. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs ENLT Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while ENLT trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs NEP Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs AMPS Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs FLNC Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 617M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while FLNC trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -21.45. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs NXXT Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 376.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while NXXT trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs SUUN Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while SUUN trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs ELLO Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while ELLO trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is -23.95. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs NRGV Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while NRGV trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs VGAS Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while VGAS trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs AZRE Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs RAIN Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while RAIN trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAIN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs CREG Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while CREG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs HLGN-WT Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs HLGN Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while HLGN trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLGN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs BNRG Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while BNRG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs ADN Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while ADN trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADN's ROE of +182.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs HTOO Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while HTOO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs HTOOW Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while HTOOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs WAVE Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while WAVE trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs ALCE Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while ALCE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALCE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs ELIQ Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs ADNWW Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while ADNWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +182.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.
ORA vs LFG Comparison
ORA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORA stands at 4.7B. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ORA is priced at $77.80, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORA currently has a P/E ratio of 37.77, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ORA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ORA is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORA.