Quanta Services, Inc.
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | $421.68 | +3.55% | 62.5B | 68.16 | $6.19 | +0.09% |
| EME | $635.06 | +9.72% | 28.4B | 28.05 | $22.63 | +0.16% |
| FIX | $688.74 | +22.37% | 24.3B | 35.35 | $19.47 | +0.22% |
| J | $143.45 | +0.93% | 17.2B | 47.35 | $3.03 | +0.82% |
| ACM | $115.36 | +2.02% | 15.3B | 24.70 | $4.67 | +0.87% |
| MTZ | $186.19 | +2.44% | 14.7B | 68.20 | $2.73 | N/A |
| APG | $35.15 | +1.33% | 14.6B | 85.73 | $0.41 | N/A |
| STN | $110.20 | -0.65% | 12.6B | 44.81 | $2.46 | +0.57% |
| BLD | $383.97 | +1.88% | 11B | 19.50 | $19.71 | N/A |
| TTEK | $38.30 | +0.08% | 10.1B | 55.51 | $0.69 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
PWR vs EME Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while EME trades at $635.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check EME's competition here
PWR vs FIX Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while FIX trades at $688.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FIX's competition here
PWR vs J Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while J trades at $143.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas J's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check J's competition here
PWR vs ACM Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ACM trades at $115.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ACM's competition here
PWR vs MTZ Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while MTZ trades at $186.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 68.20. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTZ's competition here
PWR vs APG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while APG trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 85.73. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check APG's competition here
PWR vs STN Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while STN trades at $110.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STN's competition here
PWR vs BLD Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while BLD trades at $383.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLD's competition here
PWR vs TTEK Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while TTEK trades at $38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TTEK's competition here
PWR vs FLR Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while FLR trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FLR's competition here
PWR vs STRL Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while STRL trades at $268.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STRL's competition here
PWR vs DY Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while DY trades at $264.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DY's competition here
PWR vs IESC Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while IESC trades at $357.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IESC's competition here
PWR vs KBR Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while KBR trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check KBR's competition here
PWR vs ROAD Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ROAD trades at $105.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 90.90. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ROAD's competition here
PWR vs PRIM Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while PRIM trades at $92.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PRIM's competition here
PWR vs GVA Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while GVA trades at $95.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GVA's competition here
PWR vs ECG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ECG trades at $73.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ECG's competition here
PWR vs AGX Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while AGX trades at $235.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGX's competition here
PWR vs MYRG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while MYRG trades at $200.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 92.30. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MYRG's competition here
PWR vs TPC Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while TPC trades at $47.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TPC's competition here
PWR vs LMB Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while LMB trades at $133.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LMB's competition here
PWR vs NVEE Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while NVEE trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 51.27. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check NVEE's competition here
PWR vs WLDN Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while WLDN trades at $82.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 48.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLDN's competition here
PWR vs AMRC Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 953.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while AMRC trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AMRC's competition here
PWR vs GLDD Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while GLDD trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GLDD's competition here
PWR vs BWMN Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while BWMN trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 212.53. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BWMN's competition here
PWR vs MTRX Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while MTRX trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTRX's competition here
PWR vs ORN Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 367.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ORN trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 93.02. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ORN's competition here
PWR vs BBCP Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while BBCP trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BBCP's competition here
PWR vs RITR Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 277.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while RITR trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 55.87. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check RITR's competition here
PWR vs SLND Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while SLND trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SLND's competition here
PWR vs JUNE Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while JUNE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JUNE's competition here
PWR vs MIMI Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while MIMI trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 264.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MIMI's competition here
PWR vs AENZ Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AENZ's competition here
PWR vs ESOA Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ESOA trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ESOA's competition here
PWR vs CSLRW Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CSLRW's competition here
PWR vs BLNK Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while BLNK trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLNK's competition here
PWR vs OEG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OEG's competition here
PWR vs VATE Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while VATE trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check VATE's competition here
PWR vs ONEG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ONEG trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 53.55. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ONEG's competition here
PWR vs SHIM Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while SHIM trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SHIM's competition here
PWR vs AGFY Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while AGFY trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGFY's competition here
PWR vs MSW Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while MSW trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MSW's competition here
PWR vs DRTT Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DRTT's competition here
PWR vs SKBL Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while SKBL trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKBL's competition here
PWR vs PGHL Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PGHL's competition here
PWR vs WXM Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while WXM trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WXM's competition here
PWR vs FGL Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while FGL trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FGL's competition here
PWR vs SKK Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while SKK trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKK's competition here
PWR vs WLMS Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLMS's competition here
PWR vs FBGL Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while FBGL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FBGL's competition here
PWR vs SUNE Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while SUNE trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SUNE's competition here
PWR vs ENG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ENG's competition here
PWR vs WLGS Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while WLGS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLGS's competition here
PWR vs OIG Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OIG's competition here
PWR vs ATCX Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while ATCX trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ATCX's competition here
PWR vs SCCI Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PWR has daily volatility of 2.76 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here
PWR vs HIL Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check HIL's competition here
PWR vs IEA Comparison July 2025
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 62.5B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $421.68, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 68.16, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEA's competition here