Shell plc
Shell plc (RDS-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDS-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS-A | $51.04 | -0.14% | 0 | 42.96 | $1.19 | +4.11% |
| XOM | $107.38 | -0.20% | 457.8B | 15.25 | $7.04 | +3.65% |
| CVX | $155.16 | -0.46% | 317.8B | 19.98 | $7.77 | +4.30% |
| SHEL | $72.64 | -0.15% | 212.2B | 16.21 | $4.48 | +3.87% |
| TTE | $61.52 | +0.24% | 135.5B | 11.14 | $5.52 | +5.75% |
| BP | $34.64 | +0.96% | 89.6B | 138.57 | $0.25 | +5.50% |
| PBR | $12.08 | -1.06% | 74.9B | 5.65 | $2.14 | +14.72% |
| PBR-A | $11.17 | -1.59% | 74.4B | 5.21 | $2.14 | +16.73% |
| EQNR | $24.50 | -0.37% | 62.5B | 8.12 | $3.02 | +10.06% |
| E | $35.19 | -0.03% | 53B | 20.45 | $1.72 | +6.76% |
Stock Comparison
RDS-A vs XOM Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 457.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while XOM trades at $107.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check XOM's competition here
RDS-A vs CVX Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 317.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CVX trades at $155.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CVX's competition here
RDS-A vs SHEL Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 212.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SHEL trades at $72.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SHEL's competition here
RDS-A vs TTE Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TTE trades at $61.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TTE's competition here
RDS-A vs BP Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while BP trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 138.57. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check BP's competition here
RDS-A vs PBR Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PBR trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check PBR's competition here
RDS-A vs PBR-A Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PBR-A trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check PBR-A's competition here
RDS-A vs EQNR Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while EQNR trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check EQNR's competition here
RDS-A vs E Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, E has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while E trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas E's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check E's competition here
RDS-A vs SU Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SU trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SU's competition here
RDS-A vs IMO Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while IMO trades at $83.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check IMO's competition here
RDS-A vs CVE Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CVE trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CVE's competition here
RDS-A vs EC Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while EC trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check EC's competition here
RDS-A vs YPF Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while YPF trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check YPF's competition here
RDS-A vs NFG Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while NFG trades at $87.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check NFG's competition here
RDS-A vs TGS Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TGS trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TGS's competition here
RDS-A vs TANNZ Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TANNZ's competition here
RDS-A vs SLNG Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SLNG trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 86.40. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SLNG's competition here
RDS-A vs CGBS Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CGBS's competition here
RDS-A vs SKYQ Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SKYQ trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SKYQ's competition here
RDS-A vs ZEST Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check ZEST's competition here
RDS-A vs RDS-B Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check RDS-B's competition here
RDS-A vs SNP Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SNP's competition here
RDS-A vs TELZ Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TELZ's competition here
RDS-A vs PTR Comparison August 2025
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check PTR's competition here