Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (REGN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGN | $564.64 | -1.35% | 59.9B | 14.36 | $39.32 | +0.31% |
| VRTX | $472.27 | -0.98% | 121.3B | -123.96 | -$3.81 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $328.00 | +0.72% | 42.7B | -155.32 | -$2.11 | N/A |
| ARGX | $591.74 | +2.84% | 36.2B | 36.08 | $16.40 | N/A |
| BNTX | $114.57 | -0.03% | 27.5B | -30.88 | -$3.71 | N/A |
| RPRX | $36.59 | +1.61% | 20.6B | 14.93 | $2.45 | +2.35% |
| SMMT | $27.57 | -1.57% | 20.5B | -81.09 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.2B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
| DNA-WT | $0.27 | -2.76% | 18.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
REGN vs VRTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while VRTX trades at $472.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -123.96. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check VRTX's competition here
REGN vs SGEN Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SGEN's competition here
REGN vs ALNY Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ALNY trades at $328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -155.32. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ALNY's competition here
REGN vs ARGX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ARGX trades at $591.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ARGX's competition here
REGN vs BNTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while BNTX trades at $114.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -30.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BNTX's competition here
REGN vs RPRX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RPRX trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RPRX's competition here
REGN vs SMMT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while SMMT trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -81.09. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SMMT's competition here
REGN vs BGNE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BGNE's competition here
REGN vs DNA-WT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check DNA-WT's competition here
REGN vs GMAB Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while GMAB trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check GMAB's competition here
REGN vs UTHR Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while UTHR trades at $306.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check UTHR's competition here
REGN vs INCY Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while INCY trades at $70.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 352.45. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check INCY's competition here
REGN vs MRNA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MRNA trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MRNA's competition here
REGN vs KRTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KRTX's competition here
REGN vs EXEL Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while EXEL trades at $44.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check EXEL's competition here
REGN vs BMRN Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while BMRN trades at $59.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BMRN's competition here
REGN vs ASND Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ASND trades at $168.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ASND's competition here
REGN vs RXDX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RXDX's competition here
REGN vs TECH Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while TECH trades at $58.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 70.45. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TECH's competition here
REGN vs VRNA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while VRNA trades at $105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check VRNA's competition here
REGN vs IMGN Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IMGN's competition here
REGN vs BBIO Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while BBIO trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BBIO's competition here
REGN vs BPMC Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BPMC's competition here
REGN vs CERE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CERE's competition here
REGN vs ROIVW Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ROIVW's competition here
REGN vs ROIV Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ROIV trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ROIV's competition here
REGN vs HALO Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while HALO trades at $58.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check HALO's competition here
REGN vs CORT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CORT trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 58.77. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CORT's competition here
REGN vs JAZZ Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while JAZZ trades at $118.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check JAZZ's competition here
REGN vs RVMD Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RVMD trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RVMD's competition here
REGN vs IONS Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IONS trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IONS's competition here
REGN vs MDGL Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MDGL trades at $299.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MDGL's competition here
REGN vs RETA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RETA's competition here
REGN vs AMRN Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AMRN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while AMRN trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas AMRN's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to AMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AMRN's competition here
REGN vs NUVL Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while NUVL trades at $82.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check NUVL's competition here
REGN vs TGTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while TGTX trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 146.12. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TGTX's competition here
REGN vs RYTM Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RYTM trades at $87.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -31.17. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RYTM's competition here
REGN vs CRSP Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CRSP trades at $66.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CRSP's competition here
REGN vs ABCM Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ABCM's competition here
REGN vs ISEE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ISEE's competition here
REGN vs AXSM Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while AXSM trades at $104.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AXSM's competition here
REGN vs MRUS Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MRUS trades at $65.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MRUS's competition here
REGN vs TLX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while TLX trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 154.33. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TLX's competition here
REGN vs PCVX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while PCVX trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PCVX's competition here
REGN vs SLNO Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while SLNO trades at $88.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SLNO's competition here
REGN vs ALPN Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ALPN's competition here
REGN vs CYTK Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CYTK trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CYTK's competition here
REGN vs ABVX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ABVX trades at $69.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -20.22. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ABVX's competition here
REGN vs ALKS Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ALKS trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ALKS's competition here
REGN vs KRYS Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while KRYS trades at $150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KRYS's competition here
REGN vs OPT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check OPT's competition here
REGN vs MTSR Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MTSR trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MTSR's competition here
REGN vs ZLAB Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ZLAB trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ZLAB's competition here
REGN vs ADMA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ADMA trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ADMA's competition here
REGN vs MRTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MRTX's competition here
REGN vs LEGN Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while LEGN trades at $44.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -37.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check LEGN's competition here
REGN vs AKRO Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while AKRO trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AKRO's competition here
REGN vs RNA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RNA trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RNA's competition here
REGN vs ACLX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ACLX trades at $70.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ACLX's competition here
REGN vs ACAD Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ACAD trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ACAD's competition here
REGN vs VKTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while VKTX trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -28.85. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check VKTX's competition here
REGN vs RYZB Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RYZB's competition here
REGN vs CBAY Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CBAY's competition here
REGN vs SRRK Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while SRRK trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -15.34. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SRRK's competition here
REGN vs PTCT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while PTCT trades at $46.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PTCT's competition here
REGN vs SWTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SWTX's competition here
REGN vs MLTX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MLTX trades at $55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MLTX's competition here
REGN vs AAPG Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while AAPG trades at $39.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -53.01. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AAPG's competition here
REGN vs PTGX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while PTGX trades at $53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 68.90. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PTGX's competition here
REGN vs KYMR Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while KYMR trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -14.74. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KYMR's competition here
REGN vs IMVT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IMVT trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IMVT's competition here
REGN vs MORF Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MORF's competition here
REGN vs MOR Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOR's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MOR's competition here
REGN vs CRNX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CRNX trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CRNX's competition here
REGN vs KDNY Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KDNY's competition here
REGN vs RXRX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RXRX trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RXRX's competition here
REGN vs IBRX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IBRX trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IBRX's competition here
REGN vs NAMS Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while NAMS trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check NAMS's competition here
REGN vs MYOV Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MYOV's competition here
REGN vs MIRM Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MIRM trades at $52.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MIRM's competition here
REGN vs RARE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while RARE trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RARE's competition here
REGN vs CPRX Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CPRX trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CPRX's competition here
REGN vs LGND Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while LGND trades at $132.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -18.22. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check LGND's competition here
REGN vs APLS Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while APLS trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check APLS's competition here
REGN vs APGE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while APGE trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check APGE's competition here
REGN vs NAMSW Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while NAMSW trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check NAMSW's competition here
REGN vs XENE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while XENE trades at $31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check XENE's competition here
REGN vs PRVB Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PRVB's competition here
REGN vs LBPH Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check LBPH's competition here
REGN vs IMRA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IMRA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IMRA trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IMRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to IMRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IMRA's competition here
REGN vs AGIO Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, AGIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while AGIO trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas AGIO's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGIO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to AGIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AGIO's competition here
REGN vs DICE Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check DICE's competition here
REGN vs ARWR Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while ARWR trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ARWR's competition here
REGN vs IDYA Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IDYA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IDYA trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IDYA's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IDYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to IDYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IDYA's competition here
REGN vs MESO Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, MESO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while MESO trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas MESO's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MESO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MESO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MESO's competition here
REGN vs CALT Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CALT's competition here
REGN vs HRMY Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, HRMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while HRMY trades at $36.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas HRMY's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HRMY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to HRMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check HRMY's competition here
REGN vs BEAM Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, BEAM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while BEAM trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas BEAM's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEAM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BEAM's competition here
REGN vs IRON Comparison July 2025
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 59.9B. In comparison, IRON has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $564.64, while IRON trades at $60.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.36, whereas IRON's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to IRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IRON's competition here