ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RETO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RETO | $2.35 | -6.00% | 6.9M | -0.02 | -$101.00 | N/A |
| CRH | $98.54 | -1.52% | 66.6B | 20.92 | $4.71 | +1.47% |
| VMC | $270.11 | -1.72% | 35.7B | 37.92 | $7.12 | +0.71% |
| MLM | $575.88 | -1.68% | 34.7B | 33.00 | $17.45 | +0.55% |
| JHX | $27.00 | +0.22% | 15.6B | 27.54 | $0.98 | N/A |
| CX | $8.41 | +0.00% | 12.2B | 13.80 | $0.61 | +1.01% |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $220.92 | -2.35% | 7.2B | 16.08 | $13.78 | +0.45% |
| KNF | $82.00 | -0.22% | 4.6B | 25.80 | $3.18 | N/A |
| TGLS | $76.88 | -0.45% | 3.6B | 20.78 | $3.70 | +0.73% |
Stock Comparison
RETO vs CRH Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while CRH trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check CRH's competition here
RETO vs VMC Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while VMC trades at $270.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check VMC's competition here
RETO vs MLM Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while MLM trades at $575.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check MLM's competition here
RETO vs JHX Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while JHX trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check JHX's competition here
RETO vs CX Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while CX trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check CX's competition here
RETO vs SUM Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check SUM's competition here
RETO vs EXP Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while EXP trades at $220.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check EXP's competition here
RETO vs KNF Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while KNF trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check KNF's competition here
RETO vs TGLS Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while TGLS trades at $76.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check TGLS's competition here
RETO vs BCC Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while BCC trades at $86.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check BCC's competition here
RETO vs USLM Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while USLM trades at $108.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check USLM's competition here
RETO vs TTAM Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while TTAM trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check TTAM's competition here
RETO vs LOMA Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while LOMA trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check LOMA's competition here
RETO vs CPAC Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 520.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while CPAC trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check CPAC's competition here
RETO vs SMID Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while SMID trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check SMID's competition here
RETO vs FEAM Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while FEAM trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check FEAM's competition here
RETO vs CAPT Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while CAPT trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check CAPT's competition here
RETO vs STAI Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while STAI trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to STAI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check STAI's competition here
RETO vs USCR Comparison July 2025
RETO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RETO stands at 6.9M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RETO is priced at $2.35, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RETO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, RETO's ROE is -0.24%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RETO is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RETO.Check USCR's competition here