Rocket Companies, Inc.
Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $14.86 | -8.33% | 31.3B | -495.33 | -$0.03 | +5.31% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| COOP | $156.38 | -7.63% | 10B | 17.53 | $8.92 | N/A |
| UWMC-WT | $0.09 | +6.26% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | +9.09% |
| UWMC | $4.38 | -4.58% | 5.5B | -54.62 | -$0.08 | +9.09% |
| PFSI | $93.26 | -3.42% | 4.8B | 14.31 | $6.52 | +1.27% |
| WD | $75.93 | +0.03% | 2.6B | 26.01 | $2.92 | +3.46% |
| GHLD | $19.86 | +0.05% | 1.2B | 27.97 | $0.71 | +2.52% |
| ECPG | $38.77 | -2.66% | 905.5M | -8.00 | -$4.85 | N/A |
| VEL | $17.51 | -2.23% | 640.1M | 9.09 | $1.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs MMAC Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check MMAC's competition here
RKT vs COOP Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while COOP trades at $156.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check COOP's competition here
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
RKT vs UWMC Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while UWMC trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is -54.62. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC's competition here
RKT vs PFSI Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while PFSI trades at $93.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PFSI's competition here
RKT vs WD Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while WD trades at $75.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check WD's competition here
RKT vs GHLD Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while GHLD trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHLD's competition here
RKT vs ECPG Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 905.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while ECPG trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ECPG's competition here
RKT vs VEL Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 640.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while VEL trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check VEL's competition here
RKT vs LDI Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 593.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while LDI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LDI's competition here
RKT vs ATAX Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ATAX's competition here
RKT vs HMPT Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check HMPT's competition here
RKT vs ONIT Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while ONIT trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ONIT's competition here
RKT vs GHI Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while GHI trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHI's competition here
RKT vs BETR Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 220.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while BETR trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETR's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETR's competition here
RKT vs BETRW Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while BETRW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETRW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETRW's competition here
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 209.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while SNFCA trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check SNFCA's competition here
RKT vs OCN Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check OCN's competition here
RKT vs IOR Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while IOR trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IOR's competition here
RKT vs IMH Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMH's ROE of +47.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IMH's competition here
RKT vs PAPL Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while PAPL trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PAPL's competition here
RKT vs CNF Comparison July 2025
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 31.3B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $14.86, while CNF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -495.33, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CNF's competition here