RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fd Retail
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fd Retail (RLSFX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RLSFX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLSFX | $14.73 | +0.48% | 36.6M | 33.13 | $0.44 | N/A |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $50.03 | +0.00% | 59.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| VTAPX | $25.08 | +0.00% | 59.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.70% |
| VFSTX | $10.44 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.32% |
| VFSUX | $10.44 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.42% |
| VGSH | $58.56 | +0.03% | 27.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.16% |
| VSBSX | $19.53 | +0.00% | 27.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.13% |
| VWSTX | $15.83 | +0.00% | 15.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
RLSFX vs FIYY Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FIYY's competition here
RLSFX vs FFEU Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FFEU's competition here
RLSFX vs VTIP Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VTIP trades at $50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check VTIP's competition here
RLSFX vs VTAPX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VTAPX trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VTAPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTAPX's competition here
RLSFX vs VFSTX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VFSTX trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VFSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VFSTX's competition here
RLSFX vs VFSUX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VFSUX trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VFSUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VFSUX's competition here
RLSFX vs VGSH Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VGSH trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check VGSH's competition here
RLSFX vs VSBSX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VSBSX trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VSBSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSBSX's competition here
RLSFX vs VWSTX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VWSTX trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VWSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VWSTX's competition here
RLSFX vs MINT Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while MINT trades at $100.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check MINT's competition here
RLSFX vs ASBFX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while ASBFX trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and ASBFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASBFX's competition here
RLSFX vs SCHO Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SCHO trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SCHO's competition here
RLSFX vs PTSHX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while PTSHX trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and PTSHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTSHX's competition here
RLSFX vs FTSM Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FTSM trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FTSM's competition here
RLSFX vs VFISX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VFISX trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VFISX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VFISX's competition here
RLSFX vs SPTS Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SPTS trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SPTS's competition here
RLSFX vs SPXL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SPXL trades at $188.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SPXL's competition here
RLSFX vs TMF Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TMF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TMF's competition here
RLSFX vs JSDHX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while JSDHX trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and JSDHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSDHX's competition here
RLSFX vs VSGBX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VSGBX trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VSGBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSGBX's competition here
RLSFX vs VSGDX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while VSGDX trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and VSGDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSGDX's competition here
RLSFX vs TECL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TECL trades at $102.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TECL's competition here
RLSFX vs FLVCX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FLVCX trades at $44.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and FLVCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLVCX's competition here
RLSFX vs BITX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while BITX trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check BITX's competition here
RLSFX vs FAS Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FAS trades at $177.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FAS's competition here
RLSFX vs TBLL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TBLL trades at $105.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TBLL's competition here
RLSFX vs FSTTX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FSTTX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and FSTTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSTTX's competition here
RLSFX vs DIAYX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DIAYX trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and DIAYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIAYX's competition here
RLSFX vs DHLSX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DHLSX trades at $29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and DHLSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DHLSX's competition here
RLSFX vs DHFCX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and DHFCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DHFCX's competition here
RLSFX vs FNGU Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FNGU trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FNGU's competition here
RLSFX vs PAIAX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while PAIAX trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and PAIAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAIAX's competition here
RLSFX vs DWT Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check DWT's competition here
RLSFX vs ORSTX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and ORSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORSTX's competition here
RLSFX vs BULZ Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while BULZ trades at $186.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 62.11. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BULZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check BULZ's competition here
RLSFX vs PRFSX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while PRFSX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and PRFSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRFSX's competition here
RLSFX vs SOXS Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SOXS trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SOXS's competition here
RLSFX vs ACSNX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while ACSNX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and ACSNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACSNX's competition here
RLSFX vs BASOX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while BASOX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and BASOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BASOX's competition here
RLSFX vs CPLSX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while CPLSX trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and CPLSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPLSX's competition here
RLSFX vs RYCCX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while RYCCX trades at $439.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and RYCCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYCCX's competition here
RLSFX vs RYVLX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while RYVLX trades at $627.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and RYVLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYVLX's competition here
RLSFX vs RYVYX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while RYVYX trades at $626.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and RYVYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYVYX's competition here
RLSFX vs SH Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SH trades at $38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SH's competition here
RLSFX vs TAFI Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 789.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TAFI trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TAFI's competition here
RLSFX vs EXMAX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while EXMAX trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and EXMAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXMAX's competition here
RLSFX vs EMAIX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while EMAIX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and EMAIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMAIX's competition here
RLSFX vs TUA Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 664.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TUA trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TUA's competition here
RLSFX vs JSCP Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 650.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while JSCP trades at $47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check JSCP's competition here
RLSFX vs NVDX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 648.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while NVDX trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check NVDX's competition here
RLSFX vs GDXU Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while GDXU trades at $76.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check GDXU's competition here
RLSFX vs DPST Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 603M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DPST trades at $96.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check DPST's competition here
RLSFX vs NUGT Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while NUGT trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check NUGT's competition here
RLSFX vs FNGO Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 564.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FNGO trades at $111.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 38.24. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FNGO's competition here
RLSFX vs GIYAX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 543M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while GIYAX trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and GIYAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIYAX's competition here
RLSFX vs UVXY Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while UVXY trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check UVXY's competition here
RLSFX vs BPRRX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while BPRRX trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and BPRRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPRRX's competition here
RLSFX vs BPIRX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while BPIRX trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and BPIRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPIRX's competition here
RLSFX vs PSQ Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while PSQ trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check PSQ's competition here
RLSFX vs DXQLX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DXQLX trades at $104.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and DXQLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DXQLX's competition here
RLSFX vs SPXU Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 500.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SPXU trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SPXU's competition here
RLSFX vs DGAZ Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DGAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check DGAZ's competition here
RLSFX vs FSMB Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FSMB trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FSMB's competition here
RLSFX vs SDHY Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 411.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SDHY trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SDHY's competition here
RLSFX vs SPXS Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SPXS trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SPXS's competition here
RLSFX vs SDS Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SDS trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SDS's competition here
RLSFX vs GGLL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while GGLL trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check GGLL's competition here
RLSFX vs SEMRX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and SEMRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEMRX's competition here
RLSFX vs FSHSX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FSHSX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and FSHSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSHSX's competition here
RLSFX vs AAPU Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while AAPU trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check AAPU's competition here
RLSFX vs NAIL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while NAIL trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check NAIL's competition here
RLSFX vs KOLD Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while KOLD trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check KOLD's competition here
RLSFX vs MRRL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check MRRL's competition here
RLSFX vs DUST Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DUST trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check DUST's competition here
RLSFX vs JNUG Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while JNUG trades at $79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check JNUG's competition here
RLSFX vs TZA Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 301.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TZA trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TZA's competition here
RLSFX vs FLGE Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FLGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FLGE's competition here
RLSFX vs DFEN Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while DFEN trades at $59.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check DFEN's competition here
RLSFX vs MORL Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check MORL's competition here
RLSFX vs SVXY Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SVXY trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SVXY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SVXY's competition here
RLSFX vs SMB Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SMB trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SMB's competition here
RLSFX vs AMZU Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while AMZU trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check AMZU's competition here
RLSFX vs SVIX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SVIX trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SVIX's competition here
RLSFX vs QID Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while QID trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check QID's competition here
RLSFX vs STOT Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while STOT trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check STOT's competition here
RLSFX vs GUSH Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while GUSH trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check GUSH's competition here
RLSFX vs FTSD Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FTSD trades at $90.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FTSD's competition here
RLSFX vs TENG Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TENG's competition here
RLSFX vs ERX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 228.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while ERX trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check ERX's competition here
RLSFX vs UUP Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 212.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while UUP trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check UUP's competition here
RLSFX vs REML Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to REML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check REML's competition here
RLSFX vs FUMB Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while FUMB trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check FUMB's competition here
RLSFX vs TWUSX Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TWUSX trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX and TWUSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWUSX's competition here
RLSFX vs SDOW Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while SDOW trades at $39.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check SDOW's competition here
RLSFX vs CLSE Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while CLSE trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check CLSE's competition here
RLSFX vs EMNT Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while EMNT trades at $98.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check EMNT's competition here
RLSFX vs TMV Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while TMV trades at $39.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check TMV's competition here
RLSFX vs CVSB Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while CVSB trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check CVSB's competition here
RLSFX vs PULT Comparison July 2025
RLSFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLSFX stands at 36.6M. In comparison, PULT has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLSFX is priced at $14.73, while PULT trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLSFX currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLSFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PULT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLSFX is less volatile compared to PULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLSFX.Check PULT's competition here