Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | $2.06 | -4.63% | 236.5M | -14.71 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| ETN | $384.90 | +1.23% | 150.6B | 38.85 | $9.91 | +1.03% |
| PH | $729.62 | +0.20% | 93.2B | 28.11 | $25.96 | +0.91% |
| EMR | $146.82 | -0.04% | 82.6B | 42.44 | $3.46 | +1.43% |
| ITW | $261.83 | -0.54% | 76.7B | 23.03 | $11.37 | +2.29% |
| HWM | $186.80 | +0.21% | 75.4B | 61.07 | $3.06 | +0.19% |
| ROP | $560.37 | +0.60% | 60.2B | 39.27 | $14.27 | +0.57% |
| CMI | $365.27 | +0.91% | 50.3B | 18.01 | $20.29 | +2.00% |
| AME | $179.72 | -0.86% | 41.5B | 29.40 | $6.11 | +0.66% |
| ROK | $357.01 | -0.27% | 40.3B | 45.03 | $7.93 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
RR vs ETN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 150.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ETN trades at $384.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ETN's competition here
RR vs PH Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while PH trades at $729.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check PH's competition here
RR vs EMR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while EMR trades at $146.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 42.44. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check EMR's competition here
RR vs ITW Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ITW trades at $261.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ITW's competition here
RR vs HWM Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HWM trades at $186.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 61.07. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HWM's competition here
RR vs ROP Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ROP trades at $560.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ROP's competition here
RR vs CMI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CMI trades at $365.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CMI's competition here
RR vs AME Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while AME trades at $179.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check AME's competition here
RR vs ROK Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ROK trades at $357.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ROK's competition here
RR vs B Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while B trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check B's competition here
RR vs OTIS Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while OTIS trades at $89.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check OTIS's competition here
RR vs IR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while IR trades at $86.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check IR's competition here
RR vs XYL Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while XYL trades at $131.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check XYL's competition here
RR vs HWM-P Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HWM-P trades at $67.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 94.53. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HWM-P's competition here
RR vs DOV Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while DOV trades at $186.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check DOV's competition here
RR vs PNR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while PNR trades at $102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check PNR's competition here
RR vs GGG Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GGG trades at $84.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GGG's competition here
RR vs IEX Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while IEX trades at $183.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check IEX's competition here
RR vs ITT Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ITT trades at $158.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ITT's competition here
RR vs NDSN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while NDSN trades at $219.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check NDSN's competition here
RR vs CR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CR trades at $189.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CR's competition here
RR vs AOS Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while AOS trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check AOS's competition here
RR vs RRX Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while RRX trades at $154.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check RRX's competition here
RR vs GNRC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GNRC trades at $153.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GNRC's competition here
RR vs WTS Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while WTS trades at $251.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check WTS's competition here
RR vs DCI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while DCI trades at $71.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check DCI's competition here
RR vs SPXC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SPXC trades at $175.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SPXC's competition here
RR vs PSN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while PSN trades at $75.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check PSN's competition here
RR vs MIDD Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while MIDD trades at $148.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check MIDD's competition here
RR vs GTLS Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GTLS trades at $170.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GTLS's competition here
RR vs FLS Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while FLS trades at $54.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check FLS's competition here
RR vs JBTM Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while JBTM trades at $135.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -94.83. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check JBTM's competition here
RR vs GTES Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GTES trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GTES's competition here
RR vs MIR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while MIR trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -435.20. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check MIR's competition here
RR vs CSWI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CSWI's competition here
RR vs NPO Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while NPO trades at $206.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 51.39. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check NPO's competition here
RR vs FELE Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while FELE trades at $92.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check FELE's competition here
RR vs AIMC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check AIMC's competition here
RR vs KAI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while KAI trades at $339.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check KAI's competition here
RR vs JBT Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check JBT's competition here
RR vs MWA Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while MWA trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check MWA's competition here
RR vs CXT Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CXT trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CXT's competition here
RR vs ATS Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ATS trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -150.60. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ATS's competition here
RR vs GTLS-PB Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GTLS-PB trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
RR vs CFX Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CFX's competition here
RR vs SHPW Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SHPW's competition here
RR vs PSIX Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while PSIX trades at $89.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check PSIX's competition here
RR vs EPAC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while EPAC trades at $37.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check EPAC's competition here
RR vs SXI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SXI trades at $163.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SXI's competition here
RR vs AMSC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while AMSC trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 268.81. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check AMSC's competition here
RR vs NNE Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while NNE trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -39.74. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check NNE's competition here
RR vs ENOV Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while ENOV trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check ENOV's competition here
RR vs XMTR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while XMTR trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -31.84. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check XMTR's competition here
RR vs HI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HI trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HI's competition here
RR vs TNC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while TNC trades at $82.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check TNC's competition here
RR vs HLIO Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HLIO trades at $37.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HLIO's competition here
RR vs CIR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CIR's competition here
RR vs GRC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 996M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GRC trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GRC's competition here
RR vs KRNT Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 982.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while KRNT trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -120.39. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check KRNT's competition here
RR vs BW-PA Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 958.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BW-PA trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BW-PA's competition here
RR vs THR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 930.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while THR trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check THR's competition here
RR vs CYD Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 883.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CYD trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CYD's competition here
RR vs SERV Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 651.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SERV trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SERV's competition here
RR vs BLDP Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 629.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BLDP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BLDP's competition here
RR vs GHM Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 593.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GHM trades at $54.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 48.75. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GHM's competition here
RR vs OFLX Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while OFLX trades at $34.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check OFLX's competition here
RR vs BGRY Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BGRY's competition here
RR vs LXFR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while LXFR trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check LXFR's competition here
RR vs SIMA Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SIMA trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SIMA's competition here
RR vs PKOH Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 246.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while PKOH trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check PKOH's competition here
RR vs NPWR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 213.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while NPWR trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check NPWR's competition here
RR vs HUHU Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HUHU trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -69.75. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HUHU's competition here
RR vs TAYD Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while TAYD trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check TAYD's competition here
RR vs HURC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HURC trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HURC's competition here
RR vs TWIN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while TWIN trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check TWIN's competition here
RR vs SHMD Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SHMD trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SHMD's competition here
RR vs BW Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BW's competition here
RR vs XCH Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while XCH trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check XCH's competition here
RR vs PYR Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check PYR's competition here
RR vs BWEN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BWEN trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -63.25. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BWEN's competition here
RR vs LASE Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while LASE trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check LASE's competition here
RR vs TPIC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while TPIC trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check TPIC's competition here
RR vs GTEC Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while GTEC trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check GTEC's competition here
RR vs WFF Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while WFF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check WFF's competition here
RR vs HCAI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while HCAI trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check HCAI's competition here
RR vs CVV Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CVV trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -390.00. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CVV's competition here
RR vs LBGJ Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while LBGJ trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check LBGJ's competition here
RR vs BURU Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BURU trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BURU's competition here
RR vs CETY Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CETY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CETY's competition here
RR vs INLF Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while INLF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check INLF's competition here
RR vs SHMDW Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while SHMDW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check SHMDW's competition here
RR vs CGRN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CGRN's competition here
RR vs JCSE Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while JCSE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check JCSE's competition here
RR vs NMHI Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 996K. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while NMHI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check NMHI's competition here
RR vs NMHIW Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 34K. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check NMHIW's competition here
RR vs RAVN Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check RAVN's competition here
RR vs BGRYW Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check BGRYW's competition here
RR vs WBT Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check WBT's competition here
RR vs CFXA Comparison July 2025
RR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR stands at 236.5M. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RR is priced at $2.06, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR currently has a P/E ratio of -14.71, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, RR's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RR is more volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.Check CFXA's competition here