Schneider Electric S.E.
Schneider Electric S.E. SBGSF Peers
See (SBGSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBGSF | $257.58 | +1.38% | 144.5B | 28.37 | $9.08 | +1.28% |
| SMAWF | $247.18 | -0.93% | 194B | 21.93 | $11.27 | +2.21% |
| SIEGY | $122.55 | -1.44% | 192B | 21.61 | $5.67 | +1.63% |
| SBGSY | $50.65 | -0.74% | 145.1B | 28.14 | $1.80 | +1.65% |
| ATLFF | $17.00 | +14.48% | 90.3B | 26.98 | $0.63 | +1.70% |
| MHVYF | $25.00 | +0.83% | 83.9B | 49.02 | $0.51 | +0.64% |
| SMNEY | $101.69 | -0.09% | 82B | 423.71 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $102.00 | +0.49% | 81.1B | 425.00 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ATLPF | $16.53 | +3.18% | 77.6B | 26.24 | $0.63 | +1.84% |
| ATLCY | $14.01 | -2.57% | 75.1B | 22.24 | $0.63 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
SBGSF vs SMAWF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 194B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMAWF trades at $247.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SIEGY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SIEGY trades at $122.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SBGSY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SBGSY trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ATLFF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ATLFF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs MHVYF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while MHVYF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SMNEY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMNEY trades at $101.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 423.71. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SMEGF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMEGF trades at $102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 425.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ATLPF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ATLPF trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ATLCY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ATLCY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ATLKY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ATLKY trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WRTBY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WRTBY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KNYJY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KNYJY trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SHLRF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SHLRF trades at $346.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SHLAF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SHLAF trades at $348.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KNYJF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KNYJF trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WEGZY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WEGZY trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SDVKY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SDVKY trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SDVKF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SDVKF trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FANUY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FANUY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FANUF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FANUF trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SMECF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMECF trades at $374.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs NJDCY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while NJDCY trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs NNDNF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while NNDNF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SMCAY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMCAY trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WEICF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WEICF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ALFVF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ALFVF trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ALFVY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ALFVY trades at $41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs VWSYF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while VWSYF trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs VWDRY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while VWDRY trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs IHICY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while IHICY trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WEICY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SIELF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SIELF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs GCTAF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs GCTAY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WRTBF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WRTBF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KWHIY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KWHIY trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs VACNY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while VACNY trades at $40.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 46.49. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KWHIF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KWHIF trades at $71.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs GEAGF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while GEAGF trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs IHICF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while IHICF trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SMGZY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMGZY trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs VTTGF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while VTTGF trades at $330.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs RTLLF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while RTLLF trades at $842.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs TBABF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while TBABF trades at $41.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs DFKCY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while DFKCY trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WEIGF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WEIGF trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs WEGRY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while WEGRY trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs JPSWY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while JPSWY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs DAIUF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while DAIUF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs MLSPF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while MLSPF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -132.28. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs EBCOF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while EBCOF trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SMGKF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SMGKF trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs DNGFF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while DNGFF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs EBCOY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while EBCOY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs IMIAF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while IMIAF trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs RATIY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while RATIY trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SULZF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SULZF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FCHRF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs YOKEY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while YOKEY trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs HSHZY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while HSHZY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs VLMTY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SPXSY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SPXSY trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SPXSF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SPXSF trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs YOKEF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while YOKEF trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs XJNGF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while XJNGF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs CYJBF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while CYJBF trades at $83.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs HAIIF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs HSHIF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while HSHIF trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs BCHHF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KRNNF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KRNNF trades at $149.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs NRXXY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while NRXXY trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 142.07. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs NRDXF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while NRDXF trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 131.87. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs VOYJF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SFSLF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs YMATF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while YMATF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FLUIF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FLUIF trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs ATSAF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs AALBF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while AALBF trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs RTOXF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while RTOXF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs JGHAF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while JGHAF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs MRRLF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs MICLF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FJTCY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FJTCY trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs NGKIF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while NGKIF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KUKAF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FLIDY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FLIDY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs AMDWF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while AMDWF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs THKLY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while THKLY trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 53.08. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs FLIDF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs THKLF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs KRDXF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while KRDXF trades at $323.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SOHVY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SOHVY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 518.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs SOHVF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while SOHVF trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs IRRHF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while IRRHF trades at $2,943.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to IRRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs JGHHY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs NCTKF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while NCTKF trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to NCTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs MIURF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while MIURF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs MLSYY Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is more volatile compared to MLSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.
SBGSF vs HSYDF Comparison
SBGSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBGSF stands at 144.5B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBGSF is priced at $257.58, while HSYDF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBGSF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, SBGSF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SBGSF is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBGSF.