Shengfeng Development Limited
Shengfeng Development Limited (SFWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFWL | $0.99 | +0.43% | 81.3M | 7.58 | $0.13 | N/A |
| UPS | $103.56 | +1.00% | 87.7B | 15.12 | $6.85 | +6.29% |
| FDX | $243.20 | +2.83% | 57.4B | 14.46 | $16.82 | +2.30% |
| XPO | $138.31 | +1.93% | 16.3B | 42.56 | $3.25 | N/A |
| ZTO | $20.29 | +0.25% | 16.1B | 12.77 | $1.59 | +3.44% |
| EXPD | $116.70 | -0.12% | 16B | 19.38 | $6.02 | +1.29% |
| JBHT | $149.31 | -0.28% | 14.8B | 27.15 | $5.50 | +1.17% |
| CHRW | $102.71 | -0.45% | 12.2B | 24.52 | $4.19 | +2.41% |
| GXO | $52.63 | +1.66% | 6B | 84.85 | $0.62 | N/A |
| LSTR | $142.64 | +1.23% | 5B | 28.30 | $5.04 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
SFWL vs UPS Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while UPS trades at $103.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UPS's competition here
SFWL vs FDX Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while FDX trades at $243.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FDX's competition here
SFWL vs XPO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while XPO trades at $138.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check XPO's competition here
SFWL vs ZTO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ZTO trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ZTO's competition here
SFWL vs EXPD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while EXPD trades at $116.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check EXPD's competition here
SFWL vs JBHT Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while JBHT trades at $149.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JBHT's competition here
SFWL vs CHRW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CHRW trades at $102.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CHRW's competition here
SFWL vs GXO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while GXO trades at $52.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 84.85. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GXO's competition here
SFWL vs LSTR Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while LSTR trades at $142.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSTR's competition here
SFWL vs PBI Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while PBI trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PBI's competition here
SFWL vs HUBG Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while HUBG trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HUBG's competition here
SFWL vs FWRD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 976.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while FWRD trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FWRD's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTP Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while AIRTP trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 56.79. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTP's competition here
SFWL vs CYRX Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CYRX trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CYRX's competition here
SFWL vs RLGT Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while RLGT trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check RLGT's competition here
SFWL vs PAL Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while PAL trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -101.50. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PAL's competition here
SFWL vs CRGO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CRGO trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGO's competition here
SFWL vs SINO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SINO's competition here
SFWL vs FLX Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while FLX trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FLX's competition here
SFWL vs BTOC Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while BTOC trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check BTOC's competition here
SFWL vs AIRT Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while AIRT trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRT's competition here
SFWL vs JYD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while JYD trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JYD's competition here
SFWL vs CJMB Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CJMB trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CJMB's competition here
SFWL vs NCEW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while NCEW trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 82.99. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check NCEW's competition here
SFWL vs HKPD Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while HKPD trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HKPD's competition here
SFWL vs CRGOW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while CRGOW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGOW's competition here
SFWL vs PSIG Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while PSIG trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PSIG's competition here
SFWL vs GVH Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while GVH trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GVH's competition here
SFWL vs LSH Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while LSH trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSH's competition here
SFWL vs ATXG Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ATXG trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ATXG's competition here
SFWL vs SGLY Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while SGLY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SGLY's competition here
SFWL vs ECHO Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ECHO's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTW Comparison July 2025
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 81.3M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.99, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTW's competition here