Siemens AG
Siemens AG SMAWF Peers
See (SMAWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAWF | $247.95 | +1.27% | 194.6B | 22.00 | $11.27 | +2.20% |
| SIEGY | $124.49 | +0.81% | 195B | 21.96 | $5.67 | +1.86% |
| SBGSY | $51.05 | +1.05% | 146.2B | 28.36 | $1.80 | +1.64% |
| SBGSF | $254.08 | +0.23% | 142.5B | 27.98 | $9.08 | +1.29% |
| ATLFF | $17.00 | +14.48% | 90.3B | 26.98 | $0.63 | +1.69% |
| MHVYF | $24.80 | +0.34% | 83.3B | 49.59 | $0.50 | +0.62% |
| SMNEY | $102.05 | +4.98% | 82.3B | 425.21 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $101.50 | +5.82% | 80.7B | 422.92 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ATLPF | $16.53 | +3.18% | 77.6B | 26.24 | $0.63 | +1.84% |
| ATLCY | $14.41 | +1.69% | 77.3B | 22.87 | $0.63 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
SMAWF vs SIEGY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 195B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SIEGY trades at $124.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SBGSY trades at $51.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SBGSF trades at $254.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ATLFF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MHVYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while MHVYF trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 49.59. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMNEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SMNEY trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 425.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMEGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SMEGF trades at $101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 422.92. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ATLPF trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ATLCY trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ATLKY trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KNYJY trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WRTBY trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SHLRF trades at $346.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SHLAF trades at $348.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KNYJF trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WEGZY trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SDVKY trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SDVKF trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FANUY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FANUF trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NJDCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NJDCY trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMCAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SMCAY trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMECF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SMECF trades at $368.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NNDNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NNDNF trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WEICF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ALFVF trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ALFVY trades at $42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWSYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while VWSYF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWDRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while VWDRY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while IHICY trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SIELF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SIELF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KWHIY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VACNY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while VACNY trades at $41.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 47.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WRTBF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KWHIF trades at $71.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GEAGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while GEAGF trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while IHICF trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SMGZY trades at $30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VTTGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while VTTGF trades at $330.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTLLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while RTLLF trades at $842.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs TBABF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while TBABF trades at $41.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DFKCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while DFKCY trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEIGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WEIGF trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while WEGRY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DAIUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while DAIUF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MLSPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while MLSPF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -125.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DNGFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while DNGFF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JPSWY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while JPSWY trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while EBCOF trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SMGKF trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while EBCOY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IMIAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while IMIAF trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RATIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while RATIY trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SULZF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SULZF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FCHRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while YOKEY trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while HSHZY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VLMTY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SPXSY trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SPXSF trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while YOKEF trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs XJNGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while XJNGF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs CYJBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while CYJBF trades at $83.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HAIIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while HSHIF trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs BCHHF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRXXY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NRXXY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 148.29. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRNNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KRNNF trades at $149.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NRDXF trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 131.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VOYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SFSLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YMATF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while YMATF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLUIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FLUIF trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATSAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AALBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while AALBF trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTOXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while RTOXF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while JGHAF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MRRLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MICLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NGKIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NGKIF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FJTCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FJTCY trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KUKAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FLIDY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while THKLY trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AMDWF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while AMDWF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while KRDXF trades at $323.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SOHVY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 516.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while SOHVF trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IRRHF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while IRRHF trades at $2,943.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to IRRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHHY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NCTKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NCTKY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NCTKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while NCTKF trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NCTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MIURF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while MIURF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSYDF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 194.6B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $247.95, while HSYDF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.