The Southern Company

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 148.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while NEE trades at $72.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while NEE-PN trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while SOJE trades at $17.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while SOJC trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while SOJD trades at $19.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DUKB trades at $24.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DUK-PA trades at $24.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DUK trades at $115.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while NEE-PR trades at $41.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while NGG trades at $70.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while AEP trades at $101.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while SREA trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while D trades at $55.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to D's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EXC trades at $42.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PEG trades at $80.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while XEL trades at $68.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ED trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ETR trades at $82.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ELC trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while WEC trades at $105.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTB trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTE trades at $133.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTW trades at $21.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTG trades at $17.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while AEE trades at $96.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PPL trades at $34.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ES trades at $65.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while FTS trades at $47.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while FE trades at $40.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CMS trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CMSC trades at $22.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CMSA trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CMSD trades at $22.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EIX trades at $53.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while AQNB trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EBR-B trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EBR trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while LNT trades at $60.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EVRG trades at $65.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while KEP trades at $10.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PNW trades at $89.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while OGE trades at $43.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while OKLO trades at $50.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -106.93. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CMS-PB trades at $74.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while IDA trades at $115.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG-PA trades at $21.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while TXNM trades at $56.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG-PB trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CMS-PC trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ENIC trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG-PE trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG-PC trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG-PD trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCG-PG trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while POR trades at $40.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CEPU trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EDN trades at $31.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ETI-P trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 964.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EAI trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 613.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while GNE trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while GPJA trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ENO trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while EMP trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ENJ trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while VIASP trades at $25.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while VIA trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.

SO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO stands at 97B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SO is priced at $88.24, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.16, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO.