Sonos, Inc.
Sonos, Inc. SONO Peers
See (SONO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONO | $10.04 | -0.20% | 1.2B | -17.93 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| AAPL | $203.92 | +1.64% | 3T | 28.76 | $7.09 | +0.49% |
| SONY | $26.66 | +1.25% | 160.5B | 20.51 | $1.30 | +0.24% |
| FIS | $81.20 | +0.82% | 42.7B | 51.72 | $1.57 | +1.82% |
| LPL | $3.24 | -0.15% | 3.2B | -2.28 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $13.19 | +3.37% | 265.7M | 17.82 | $0.74 | N/A |
| VUZI | $2.97 | +5.32% | 226.4M | -2.88 | -$1.03 | N/A |
| VOXX | $7.50 | N/A | 169M | -2.43 | -$3.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SONO vs AAPL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while AAPL trades at $203.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs SONY Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 160.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while SONY trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FIS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while FIS trades at $81.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 51.72. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs LPL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while LPL trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VZIO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs HEAR Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs TBCH Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while TBCH trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VUZI Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while VUZI trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VOXX Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs BWNB Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while BWNB trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs GPRO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while GPRO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs BWSN Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while BWSN trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs UEIC Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while UEIC trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs KOSS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while KOSS trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -70.62. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs AXIL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while AXIL trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FOXX Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while FOXX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FEBO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while FEBO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs MSN Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while MSN trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs ZEPP Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while ZEPP trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs PXDT Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs MICS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs RIME Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while RIME trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs UTME Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WTO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while WTO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WLDS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while WLDS trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WLDSW Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $10.04, while WLDSW trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.93, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.