Spirit Realty Capital, Inc.
Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. SRC-PA Peers
See (SRC-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRC-PA | $24.26 | +0.46% | 3.8B | 13.55 | $1.79 | N/A |
| VICI | $33.46 | +0.03% | 35.4B | 13.38 | $2.50 | +5.20% |
| WPC | $63.43 | -0.46% | 13.9B | 32.70 | $1.94 | +5.59% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.1B | 24.42 | $1.76 | N/A |
| EPRT | $30.58 | -0.94% | 6B | 26.37 | $1.16 | +3.82% |
| GNL-PD | $23.17 | -0.00% | 5.2B | N/A | N/A | +13.19% |
| GNL-PE | $22.59 | +0.90% | 5B | N/A | N/A | +13.19% |
| GNL-PB | $21.30 | +0.24% | 4.7B | -156.40 | -$0.14 | +13.19% |
| DBRG-PH | $21.97 | +2.04% | 3.9B | -29.53 | -$0.74 | +0.36% |
| DBRG-PJ | $21.69 | +0.69% | 3.8B | -29.15 | -$0.74 | +0.36% |
Stock Comparison
SRC-PA vs VICI Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while VICI trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs WPC Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while WPC trades at $63.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs SRC Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs EPRT Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while EPRT trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GNL-PD Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GNL-PD trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA and GNL-PD have similar daily volatility (0.77).
SRC-PA vs GNL-PE Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GNL-PE trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GNL-PB Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GNL-PB trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -156.40. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs DBRG-PH Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while DBRG-PH trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs DBRG-PJ Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while DBRG-PJ trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -29.15. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs DBRG-PI Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while DBRG-PI trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -28.80. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs AFINP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs AFINO Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs BNL Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while BNL trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs PSB-PY Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs RTLPO Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs RTLPP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs UE Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while UE trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs DBRG Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while DBRG trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GNL Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GNL trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GNL-PA Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GNL-PA trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -164.60. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs CLNY Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLNY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs CLNC Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs ESRT Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while ESRT trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs ALEX Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while ALEX trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs AAT Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while AAT trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs AFIN Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs SAFE Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while SAFE trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs RTL Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GOODN Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GOODN trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -666.18. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs STAR-PG Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs STAR-PI Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs STAR-PD Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs AHH-PA Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 725M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while AHH-PA trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 89.50. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs AHH Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 723.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while AHH trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 70.85. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs STAR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs BRSP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while BRSP trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GOODO Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GOODO trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 700.00. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GOOD Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 637.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GOOD trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs CTO-PA Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 581.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while CTO-PA trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs CTO Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while CTO trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -32.06. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs PKST Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 520M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while PKST trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs OLP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while OLP trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs MDV-PA Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while MDV-PA trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs FVR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 242.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while FVR trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs MDV Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while MDV trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -163.11. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs MDRRP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs MDRR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while MDRR trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs SQFTP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while SQFTP trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -26.51. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs MKZR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while MKZR trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs SQFT Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while SQFT trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GIPR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GIPR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs CORR-PA Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs CORR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GIPRW Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 381K. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GIPRW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs SQFTW Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 33.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while SQFTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs STOR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs PSB Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs VER-PF Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs MGP Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs VER Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs FSPR Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs PSB-PX Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs APTS Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs GOODM Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOODM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.
SRC-PA vs PSB-PZ Comparison
SRC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRC-PA stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRC-PA is priced at $24.26, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC-PA is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC-PA.