SRM Entertainment, Inc.
SRM Entertainment, Inc. (SRM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRM | $10.30 | +53.27% | 183.7M | -42.92 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| CCL | $29.78 | -3.12% | 38.7B | 15.59 | $1.91 | N/A |
| CUK | $27.13 | -3.31% | 34.4B | 14.21 | $1.91 | N/A |
| AS | $36.82 | -2.41% | 20.4B | 99.49 | $0.37 | N/A |
| HAS | $75.05 | -2.33% | 10.5B | -18.43 | -$4.07 | +3.71% |
| PLNT | $112.41 | -0.52% | 9.4B | 53.27 | $2.11 | N/A |
| LTH | $29.09 | -0.38% | 6.4B | 30.30 | $0.96 | N/A |
| MAT | $16.89 | -16.39% | 5.5B | 10.97 | $1.54 | N/A |
| GOLF | $82.17 | -2.64% | 4.8B | 22.55 | $3.64 | +1.10% |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRM vs CCL Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while CCL trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check CCL's competition here
SRM vs CUK Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while CUK trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check CUK's competition here
SRM vs AS Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while AS trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 99.49. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check AS's competition here
SRM vs HAS Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while HAS trades at $75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check HAS's competition here
SRM vs PLNT Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while PLNT trades at $112.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 53.27. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check PLNT's competition here
SRM vs LTH Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while LTH trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check LTH's competition here
SRM vs MAT Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while MAT trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check MAT's competition here
SRM vs GOLF Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while GOLF trades at $82.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check GOLF's competition here
SRM vs ELY Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check ELY's competition here
SRM vs SEAS Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check SEAS's competition here
SRM vs FUN Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while FUN trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check FUN's competition here
SRM vs YETI Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while YETI trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check YETI's competition here
SRM vs PRKS Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while PRKS trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check PRKS's competition here
SRM vs SIX Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check SIX's competition here
SRM vs VSTO Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check VSTO's competition here
SRM vs PTON Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while PTON trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -14.95. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check PTON's competition here
SRM vs OSW Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while OSW trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check OSW's competition here
SRM vs MODG Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while MODG trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check MODG's competition here
SRM vs LUCK Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while LUCK trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -149.43. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check LUCK's competition here
SRM vs GEAR Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check GEAR's competition here
SRM vs XPOF Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while XPOF trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check XPOF's competition here
SRM vs JOUT Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while JOUT trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check JOUT's competition here
SRM vs CNXA Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check CNXA's competition here
SRM vs FNKO Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while FNKO trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check FNKO's competition here
SRM vs JAKK Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 211.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while JAKK trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check JAKK's competition here
SRM vs PLBY Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while PLBY trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +286.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check PLBY's competition here
SRM vs ESCA Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while ESCA trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check ESCA's competition here
SRM vs CLAR Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while CLAR trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check CLAR's competition here
SRM vs AOUT Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while AOUT trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -951.00. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check AOUT's competition here
SRM vs DOGZ Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while DOGZ trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check DOGZ's competition here
SRM vs BTN Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check BTN's competition here
SRM vs ISPOW Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check ISPOW's competition here
SRM vs YYAI Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while YYAI trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check YYAI's competition here
SRM vs ISPO Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while ISPO trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check ISPO's competition here
SRM vs NLS Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check NLS's competition here
SRM vs AGH Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while AGH trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check AGH's competition here
SRM vs FGH Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check FGH's competition here
SRM vs GDHG Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while GDHG trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check GDHG's competition here
SRM vs MMA Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while MMA trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check MMA's competition here
SRM vs HWH Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while HWH trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check HWH's competition here
SRM vs NWTG Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while NWTG trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check NWTG's competition here
SRM vs FXLV Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while FXLV trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check FXLV's competition here
SRM vs SPGC Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check SPGC's competition here
SRM vs BBIG Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is less volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check BBIG's competition here
SRM vs DS-PD Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check DS-PD's competition here
SRM vs BWL-A Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check BWL-A's competition here
SRM vs DS-PB Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check DS-PB's competition here
SRM vs DVD Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check DVD's competition here
SRM vs DS-PC Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check DS-PC's competition here
SRM vs DS Comparison July 2025
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 183.7M. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $10.30, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -42.92, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.Check DS's competition here