Suzano S.A.
Suzano S.A. SUZ Peers
See (SUZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUZ | $9.40 | +0.27% | 11.6B | -78.29 | -$0.12 | +0.52% |
| LPX | $88.20 | +0.44% | 6.1B | 15.45 | $5.71 | +1.23% |
| UFPI | $100.72 | +0.98% | 6.1B | 16.48 | $6.11 | +1.35% |
| WFG | $74.71 | -1.28% | 5.8B | -2490.33 | -$0.03 | +1.70% |
| SLVM | $51.06 | +0.56% | 2.1B | 7.50 | $6.81 | +3.49% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| CLW | $27.00 | +0.37% | 438.9M | -5.81 | -$4.65 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.50 | +2.12% | 354.8M | -0.79 | -$8.20 | +6.13% |
| MERC | $3.46 | -1.14% | 231.4M | -2.56 | -$1.35 | +8.56% |
Stock Comparison
SUZ vs LPX Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while LPX trades at $88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs UFPI Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while UFPI trades at $100.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs WFG Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while WFG trades at $74.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -2490.33. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs SLVM Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while SLVM trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs RFP Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs SWM Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs CLW Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while CLW trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs MATV Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 354.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while MATV trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs MERC Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 231.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while MERC trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs GLT Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs EVA Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs NWGL Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while NWGL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs JCTCF Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs JCTC Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while JCTC trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs ITP Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs NP Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs UFS Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.
SUZ vs VRS Comparison
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.40, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of -78.29, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.