Suzano S.A.
Suzano S.A. (SUZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUZ | $9.39 | -6.29% | 12.5B | 8.64 | $1.17 | +2.66% |
| LPX | $93.24 | +0.76% | 6.3B | 21.35 | $4.25 | +1.19% |
| UFPI | $99.23 | -0.36% | 5.9B | 16.99 | $5.76 | +1.38% |
| WFG | $72.03 | +0.06% | 5.5B | -44.44 | -$1.61 | +1.78% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SLVM | $47.40 | -0.92% | 1.6B | 5.93 | $6.81 | +4.34% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.28 | -25.77% | 513M | -1.13 | -$8.34 | +4.13% |
| CLW | $22.22 | -3.22% | 361.2M | -11.62 | -$1.93 | N/A |
| MERC | $3.17 | +4.97% | 197.6M | -1.81 | -$1.63 | +9.98% |
Stock Comparison
SUZ vs LPX Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while LPX trades at $93.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check LPX's competition here
SUZ vs UFPI Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while UFPI trades at $99.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check UFPI's competition here
SUZ vs WFG Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while WFG trades at $72.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -44.44. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check WFG's competition here
SUZ vs RFP Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check RFP's competition here
SUZ vs SLVM Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while SLVM trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check SLVM's competition here
SUZ vs SWM Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check SWM's competition here
SUZ vs MATV Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 513M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while MATV trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check MATV's competition here
SUZ vs CLW Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while CLW trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check CLW's competition here
SUZ vs MERC Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 197.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while MERC trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check MERC's competition here
SUZ vs GLT Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check GLT's competition here
SUZ vs EVA Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check EVA's competition here
SUZ vs NWGL Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while NWGL trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check NWGL's competition here
SUZ vs JCTCF Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check JCTCF's competition here
SUZ vs JCTC Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while JCTC trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check JCTC's competition here
SUZ vs ITP Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while ITP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check ITP's competition here
SUZ vs UFS Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check UFS's competition here
SUZ vs NP Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check NP's competition here
SUZ vs VRS Comparison August 2025
SUZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUZ stands at 12.5B. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUZ is priced at $9.39, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUZ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.64, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, SUZ's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUZ is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUZ.Check VRS's competition here