AT&T Inc.
AT&T Inc. (T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | $27.92 | +0.61% | 201B | 15.97 | $1.75 | +3.98% |
| TMUS | $247.50 | +5.80% | 281B | 23.35 | $10.60 | +1.33% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $22.37 | +0.09% | 200.3B | 4.38 | $5.12 | +5.99% |
| VZ | $43.08 | +0.56% | 181.8B | 10.03 | $4.30 | +6.30% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
| T-PA | $20.17 | +0.05% | 145B | 8.48 | $2.38 | +3.98% |
| T-PC | $19.27 | -0.05% | 138.8B | 8.12 | $2.38 | +3.98% |
| CMCSA | $35.37 | -1.17% | 131.7B | 8.71 | $4.06 | +3.61% |
| AMOV | $20.75 | -1.10% | 65.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
T vs TMUS Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 281B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TMUS trades at $247.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TMUS's competition here
T vs VZA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check VZA's competition here
T vs TBB Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 200.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TBB trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TBB's competition here
T vs VZ Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 181.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while VZ trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check VZ's competition here
T vs TBC Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TBC's competition here
T vs T-PA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while T-PA trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check T-PA's competition here
T vs T-PC Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while T-PC trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check T-PC's competition here
T vs CMCSA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CMCSA trades at $35.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CMCSA's competition here
T vs AMOV Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check AMOV's competition here
T vs AMX Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while AMX trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check AMX's competition here
T vs CHTR Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CHTR trades at $380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CHTR's competition here
T vs CHT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CHT trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CHT's competition here
T vs TEF Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TEF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TEF's competition here
T vs ORAN Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ORAN's competition here
T vs VOD Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while VOD trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check VOD's competition here
T vs TU Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TU trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TU's competition here
T vs BCE Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while BCE trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 78.84. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check BCE's competition here
T vs RCI Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while RCI trades at $34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check RCI's competition here
T vs VIV Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while VIV trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check VIV's competition here
T vs TLK Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TLK trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TLK's competition here
T vs SJR Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check SJR's competition here
T vs LBRDP Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBRDP trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBRDP's competition here
T vs LBRDA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBRDA trades at $86.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBRDA's competition here
T vs LBRDK Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBRDK trades at $86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBRDK's competition here
T vs KT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while KT trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check KT's competition here
T vs MBT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check MBT's competition here
T vs FYBR Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while FYBR trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.54. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check FYBR's competition here
T vs TIMB Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TIMB trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TIMB's competition here
T vs SKM Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while SKM trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check SKM's competition here
T vs CTDD Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CTDD trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CTDD's competition here
T vs TIGO Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TIGO trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TIGO's competition here
T vs USM Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while USM trades at $71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -155.48. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check USM's competition here
T vs UZE Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while UZE trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check UZE's competition here
T vs UZD Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while UZD trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check UZD's competition here
T vs UZF Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while UZF trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check UZF's competition here
T vs TKC Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TKC trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TKC's competition here
T vs PHI Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while PHI trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check PHI's competition here
T vs CTBB Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CTBB trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CTBB's competition here
T vs LUMN Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LUMN trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LUMN's competition here
T vs TDS Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TDS trades at $39.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -38.02. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TDS's competition here
T vs LBYKV Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBYKV's competition here
T vs TDS-PU Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TDS-PU trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TDS-PU's competition here
T vs TDS-PV Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TDS-PV trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TDS-PV's competition here
T vs SNRE Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while SNRE trades at $57.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check SNRE's competition here
T vs VEON Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while VEON trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check VEON's competition here
T vs LBTYB Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBTYB trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBTYB's competition here
T vs LBTYK Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBTYK trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.66. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBTYK's competition here
T vs LBTYA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBTYA trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -16.19. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBTYA's competition here
T vs GSAT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while GSAT trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -40.21. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check GSAT's competition here
T vs DISH Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check DISH's competition here
T vs TEO Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TEO trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 92.65. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TEO's competition here
T vs IRDM Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while IRDM trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check IRDM's competition here
T vs CCOI Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CCOI trades at $48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CCOI's competition here
T vs GOGO Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while GOGO trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -394.00. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check GOGO's competition here
T vs IHS Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while IHS trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check IHS's competition here
T vs ASTSW Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ASTSW's competition here
T vs RADI Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check RADI's competition here
T vs IDT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while IDT trades at $57.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check IDT's competition here
T vs ATUS Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ATUS trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ATUS's competition here
T vs LILA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LILA trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LILA's competition here
T vs LILAK Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LILAK trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LILAK's competition here
T vs TV Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TV trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TV's competition here
T vs CABO Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 860.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CABO trades at $152.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -42.34. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CABO's competition here
T vs SHEN Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 844.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while SHEN trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -21.99. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check SHEN's competition here
T vs RBBN Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 685.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while RBBN trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check RBBN's competition here
T vs CNSL Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CNSL's competition here
T vs ATEX Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 401.4M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ATEX trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ATEX's competition here
T vs OOMA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while OOMA trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -63.37. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check OOMA's competition here
T vs WOW Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while WOW trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check WOW's competition here
T vs HCHC Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check HCHC's competition here
T vs ATNI Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ATNI trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ATNI's competition here
T vs RDCM Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while RDCM trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check RDCM's competition here
T vs CXDO Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CXDO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CXDO's competition here
T vs MTSL Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check MTSL's competition here
T vs FNGR Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while FNGR trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check FNGR's competition here
T vs TDI Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TDI trades at $34.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TDI's competition here
T vs KORE Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while KORE trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check KORE's competition here
T vs IQST Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while IQST trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check IQST's competition here
T vs PCLA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while PCLA trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check PCLA's competition here
T vs ANTE Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ANTE trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ANTE's competition here
T vs UCL Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while UCL trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check UCL's competition here
T vs SIFY Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while SIFY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check SIFY's competition here
T vs MIMO Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check MIMO's competition here
T vs QTEK Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check QTEK's competition here
T vs QTEKW Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check QTEKW's competition here
T vs COMSP Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check COMSP's competition here
T vs COMSW Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check COMSW's competition here
T vs STRY Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check STRY's competition here
T vs CBB Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check CBB's competition here
T vs TDA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TDA's competition here
T vs ALSK Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check ALSK's competition here
T vs MIMO-WT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check MIMO-WT's competition here
T vs PTNR Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check PTNR's competition here
T vs UZA Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check UZA's competition here
T vs GTT Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check GTT's competition here
T vs LORL Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LORL's competition here
T vs OIBR-C Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check OIBR-C's competition here
T vs TIGOR Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check TIGOR's competition here
T vs LBYAV Comparison July 2025
T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T stands at 201B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T is priced at $27.92, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.97, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T.Check LBYAV's competition here