Titomic Limited
Titomic Limited (TITMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TITMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TITMF | $0.16 | +0.00% | 640.8M | -42.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AIQUY | $40.01 | -1.14% | 115.6B | 29.04 | $1.38 | +1.81% |
| AIQUF | $200.27 | -0.97% | 115.1B | 29.06 | $6.87 | +1.85% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 50.2B | 32.96 | $1.76 | +0.04% |
| GVDNY | $84.39 | +0.13% | 38.2B | 28.34 | $2.92 | +1.87% |
| GVDBF | $4,476.00 | +0.00% | 37.8B | 28.71 | $142.82 | +1.93% |
| SXYAY | $23.38 | -2.26% | 37.5B | 24.88 | $0.94 | +1.78% |
| SKFOF | $235.00 | -1.28% | 37.4B | 24.91 | $9.36 | +1.73% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 33.8B | 19.52 | $0.02 | +0.09% |
| AKZOY | $21.14 | -3.07% | 33.1B | 23.11 | $0.93 | +3.45% |
Stock Comparison
TITMF vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AIQUY trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check AIQUY's competition here
TITMF vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AIQUF trades at $200.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check AIQUF's competition here
TITMF vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and PTCAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCAY's competition here
TITMF vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while GVDNY trades at $84.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check GVDNY's competition here
TITMF vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while GVDBF trades at $4,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and GVDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GVDBF's competition here
TITMF vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SXYAY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check SXYAY's competition here
TITMF vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SKFOF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check SKFOF's competition here
TITMF vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and PTPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTPIF's competition here
TITMF vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AKZOY trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check AKZOY's competition here
TITMF vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NVZMF trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and NVZMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVZMF's competition here
TITMF vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NVZMY trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 56.70. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check NVZMY's competition here
TITMF vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and EMSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMSHF's competition here
TITMF vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NDEKF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and NDEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDEKF's competition here
TITMF vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and NPCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPCPF's competition here
TITMF vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while COVTY trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.27. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check COVTY's competition here
TITMF vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SYIEF trades at $91.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and SYIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYIEF's competition here
TITMF vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SYIEY trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check SYIEY's competition here
TITMF vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CVVTF trades at $69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -27.32. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and CVVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVVTF's competition here
TITMF vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and AKZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKZOF's competition here
TITMF vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check CRTSF's competition here
TITMF vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check CHYHY's competition here
TITMF vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while BNTGF trades at $64.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and BNTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNTGF's competition here
TITMF vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while EVKIF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and EVKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVKIF's competition here
TITMF vs BNTGY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while BNTGY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check BNTGY's competition here
TITMF vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while EVKIY trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check EVKIY's competition here
TITMF vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and IMDZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMDZF's competition here
TITMF vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while OCLDY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 117.17. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and OCLDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLDY's competition here
TITMF vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ASGLY trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check ASGLY's competition here
TITMF vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ASGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGLF's competition here
TITMF vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NDEKY trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check NDEKY's competition here
TITMF vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while FUPBY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check FUPBY's competition here
TITMF vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and FUPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUPEF's competition here
TITMF vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and SCVUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCVUF's competition here
TITMF vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and SCVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCVPY's competition here
TITMF vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ARKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARKAF's competition here
TITMF vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and FUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUPPF's competition here
TITMF vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ARKAY trades at $69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check ARKAY's competition here
TITMF vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while MITUY trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and MITUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITUY's competition here
TITMF vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.83. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and OCLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLDF's competition here
TITMF vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while COIHF trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and COIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COIHF's competition here
TITMF vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while COIHY trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check COIHY's competition here
TITMF vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check KDSKF's competition here
TITMF vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while HXPLF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and HXPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HXPLF's competition here
TITMF vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while JMPLY trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and JMPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMPLY's competition here
TITMF vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and HXXPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HXXPY's competition here
TITMF vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AZLGF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and AZLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZLGF's competition here
TITMF vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while WKCMF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and WKCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WKCMF's competition here
TITMF vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and CLZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLZNF's competition here
TITMF vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and MITUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITUF's competition here
TITMF vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and AWTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWTRF's competition here
TITMF vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and JMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMPLF's competition here
TITMF vs NOFCF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and NOFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOFCF's competition here
TITMF vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CLZNY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check CLZNY's competition here
TITMF vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while MBGCF trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and MBGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBGCF's competition here
TITMF vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SASOF trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and SASOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SASOF's competition here
TITMF vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and KSANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSANF's competition here
TITMF vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while KPTCY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and KPTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPTCY's competition here
TITMF vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ICPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICPVF's competition here
TITMF vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and DACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DACHF's competition here
TITMF vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check INCZY's competition here
TITMF vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while LNXSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and LNXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNXSF's competition here
TITMF vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while LNXSY trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check LNXSY's competition here
TITMF vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TKKYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKKYY's competition here
TITMF vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ZEOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZEOOF's competition here
TITMF vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and IRLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLCF's competition here
TITMF vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ZEOOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZEOOY's competition here
TITMF vs OCINF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while OCINF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and OCINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCINF's competition here
TITMF vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and KPLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPLIF's competition here
TITMF vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and KANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KANKF's competition here
TITMF vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and BRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRRDF's competition here
TITMF vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ELMTY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ELMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMTY's competition here
TITMF vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ALZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALZCF's competition here
TITMF vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TKCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCBF's competition here
TITMF vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ELKEF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ELKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELKEF's competition here
TITMF vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TKYMY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TKYMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMY's competition here
TITMF vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TKCBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCBY's competition here
TITMF vs CSNVF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CSNVF trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and CSNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSNVF's competition here
TITMF vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while EMNSF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and EMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMNSF's competition here
TITMF vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and LNTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNTEF's competition here
TITMF vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ALPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALPKF's competition here
TITMF vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and CSNVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSNVY's competition here
TITMF vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and CUYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUYRF's competition here
TITMF vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 999.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and HUIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUIHY's competition here
TITMF vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 988.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TKYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMF's competition here
TITMF vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 980.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while FPLSF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check FPLSF's competition here
TITMF vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 917.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and DALQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DALQF's competition here
TITMF vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to AECLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and AECLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AECLY's competition here
TITMF vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 833.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and VTXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTXPF's competition here
TITMF vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 823.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and HUABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUABF's competition here
TITMF vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and SKKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKKAF's competition here
TITMF vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and HASGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HASGF's competition here
TITMF vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 778.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while DLNDY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and DLNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLNDY's competition here
TITMF vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 771M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while VBVBF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check VBVBF's competition here
TITMF vs ICHMF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, ICHMF has a market cap of 756.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while ICHMF trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas ICHMF's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to ICHMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and ICHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHMF's competition here
TITMF vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and SYCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYCHF's competition here
TITMF vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 587.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 166.50. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TYOBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYOBY's competition here
TITMF vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while NOPMF trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -33.46. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TITMF.Check NOPMF's competition here
TITMF vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and FLRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRAF's competition here
TITMF vs TNMAF Comparison August 2025
TITMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TITMF stands at 640.8M. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TITMF is priced at $0.16, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TITMF currently has a P/E ratio of -42.00, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, TITMF's ROE is -75.39%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TITMF and TNMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNMAF's competition here