Tenaris S.A.
Tenaris S.A. (TS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS | $35.33 | -1.17% | 18.7B | 9.53 | $3.70 | +6.23% |
| SLB | $32.86 | -0.03% | 48.6B | 11.09 | $2.92 | +3.45% |
| BKR | $43.43 | +0.32% | 42.1B | 13.95 | $3.06 | +2.12% |
| HAL | $21.22 | +1.53% | 17.5B | 9.63 | $2.13 | +3.31% |
| FTI | $35.57 | +1.77% | 14.4B | 16.65 | $2.10 | +0.57% |
| CHX | $25.81 | -2.97% | 4.9B | 17.09 | $1.51 | +1.47% |
| NOV | $11.96 | +0.50% | 4.4B | 9.83 | $1.21 | +4.30% |
| AROC | $22.81 | -1.77% | 4.1B | 17.64 | $1.33 | +3.25% |
| WFRD | $55.24 | -0.36% | 3.9B | 8.29 | $6.49 | +1.86% |
| LB | $59.35 | +15.11% | 3.8B | 66.57 | $0.77 | +0.59% |
Stock Comparison
TS vs SLB Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while SLB trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check SLB's competition here
TS vs BKR Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while BKR trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check BKR's competition here
TS vs HAL Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while HAL trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check HAL's competition here
TS vs FTI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while FTI trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check FTI's competition here
TS vs CHX Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check CHX's competition here
TS vs NOV Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NOV trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NOV's competition here
TS vs AROC Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while AROC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check AROC's competition here
TS vs WFRD Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while WFRD trades at $55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check WFRD's competition here
TS vs LB Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while LB trades at $59.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 66.57. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check LB's competition here
TS vs VAL-WT Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while VAL-WT trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check VAL-WT's competition here
TS vs VAL Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while VAL trades at $48.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check VAL's competition here
TS vs USAC Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while USAC trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USAC's ROE of +12.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check USAC's competition here
TS vs KGS Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while KGS trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check KGS's competition here
TS vs TDW Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while TDW trades at $61.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check TDW's competition here
TS vs TDW-WT Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check TDW-WT's competition here
TS vs WHD Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while WHD trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check WHD's competition here
TS vs NEX Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NEX's competition here
TS vs OII Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while OII trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check OII's competition here
TS vs SEI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while SEI trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 51.42. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check SEI's competition here
TS vs LBRT Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while LBRT trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check LBRT's competition here
TS vs DNOW Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while DNOW trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check DNOW's competition here
TS vs AESI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while AESI trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 95.83. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check AESI's competition here
TS vs FLOC Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while FLOC trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check FLOC's competition here
TS vs SLCA Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check SLCA's competition here
TS vs PFHC Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check PFHC's competition here
TS vs MRC Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while MRC trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 58.91. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check MRC's competition here
TS vs XPRO Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while XPRO trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check XPRO's competition here
TS vs EFXT Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while EFXT trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check EFXT's competition here
TS vs INVX Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while INVX trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check INVX's competition here
TS vs VTOL Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while VTOL trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check VTOL's competition here
TS vs RES Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 989.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while RES trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check RES's competition here
TS vs ACDC Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 976.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while ACDC trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check ACDC's competition here
TS vs WTTR Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 856.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while WTTR trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check WTTR's competition here
TS vs HLX Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 846.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while HLX trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check HLX's competition here
TS vs NPKI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 801.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NPKI trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NPKI's competition here
TS vs NESR Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 674.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NESR trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NESR's competition here
TS vs NESRW Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 639.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NESRW's competition here
TS vs NR Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NR's competition here
TS vs DRQ Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check DRQ's competition here
TS vs TTI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 521.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while TTI trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check TTI's competition here
TS vs SOI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check SOI's competition here
TS vs PUMP Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 487.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while PUMP trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check PUMP's competition here
TS vs NOA Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 478.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NOA trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NOA's competition here
TS vs CLB Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while CLB trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check CLB's competition here
TS vs FTK Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 414.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while FTK trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check FTK's competition here
TS vs CCLP Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check CCLP's competition here
TS vs NGS Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NGS trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NGS's competition here
TS vs OIS Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while OIS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check OIS's competition here
TS vs RNGR Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while RNGR trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check RNGR's competition here
TS vs FET Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while FET trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check FET's competition here
TS vs GEOS Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while GEOS trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check GEOS's competition here
TS vs BOOM Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while BOOM trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check BOOM's competition here
TS vs PFIE Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check PFIE's competition here
TS vs LSE Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while LSE trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check LSE's competition here
TS vs NCSM Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NCSM trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NCSM's competition here
TS vs SND Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while SND trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check SND's competition here
TS vs RCON Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while RCON trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check RCON's competition here
TS vs DTI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while DTI trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check DTI's competition here
TS vs DWSN Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while DWSN trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check DWSN's competition here
TS vs SDPI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check SDPI's competition here
TS vs KLXE Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while KLXE trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check KLXE's competition here
TS vs NINE Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while NINE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check NINE's competition here
TS vs ENSV Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 686.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while ENSV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check ENSV's competition here
TS vs FTSI Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check FTSI's competition here
TS vs IO Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check IO's competition here
TS vs CELP Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check CELP's competition here
TS vs ACDCW Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check ACDCW's competition here
TS vs EXTN Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check EXTN's competition here
TS vs USWS Comparison August 2025
TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.7B. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $35.33, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.Check USWS's competition here