Trane Technologies plc
Trane Technologies plc (TT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | $472.07 | +2.24% | 105.3B | 38.89 | $12.14 | +0.75% |
| JCI | $111.73 | +1.55% | 73.5B | 33.76 | $3.31 | +1.32% |
| CARR | $80.73 | +1.62% | 69.2B | 53.82 | $1.50 | +1.07% |
| LII | $660.82 | -0.56% | 23.2B | 28.24 | $23.39 | +0.72% |
| CSL | $435.11 | +1.30% | 18.8B | 24.24 | $17.95 | +0.92% |
| BLDR | $136.46 | +2.76% | 15.1B | 17.52 | $7.79 | N/A |
| MAS | $67.75 | +0.47% | 14.3B | 18.51 | $3.66 | +1.77% |
| OC | $145.90 | +1.01% | 12.4B | 20.38 | $7.16 | +1.83% |
| WMS | $118.53 | +1.32% | 9.2B | 20.58 | $5.76 | +0.56% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TT vs JCI Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while JCI trades at $111.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JCI's competition here
TT vs CARR Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while CARR trades at $80.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 53.82. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CARR's competition here
TT vs LII Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while LII trades at $660.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check LII's competition here
TT vs CSL Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while CSL trades at $435.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSL's competition here
TT vs BLDR Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while BLDR trades at $136.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BLDR's competition here
TT vs MAS Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while MAS trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MAS's ROE of -4.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MAS's competition here
TT vs OC Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while OC trades at $145.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check OC's competition here
TT vs WMS Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while WMS trades at $118.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check WMS's competition here
TT vs FBHS Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FBHS's competition here
TT vs AZEK Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AZEK's competition here
TT vs BECN Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BECN's competition here
TT vs TREX Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while TREX trades at $68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check TREX's competition here
TT vs AWI Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while AWI trades at $168.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AWI's competition here
TT vs SSD Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while SSD trades at $165.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SSD's competition here
TT vs FBIN Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while FBIN trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FBIN's competition here
TT vs AAON Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while AAON trades at $83.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AAON's competition here
TT vs IBP Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while IBP trades at $204.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check IBP's competition here
TT vs GMS Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while GMS trades at $109.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GMS's competition here
TT vs DOOR Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check DOOR's competition here
TT vs PGTI Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PGTI's competition here
TT vs ROCK Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while ROCK trades at $65.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ROCK's competition here
TT vs JBI Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while JBI trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JBI's competition here
TT vs APOG Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 922.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while APOG trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check APOG's competition here
TT vs NX Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 909.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while NX trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas NX's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check NX's competition here
TT vs SWIM Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 800.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while SWIM trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SWIM's competition here
TT vs BXC Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 641.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while BXC trades at $80.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BXC's competition here
TT vs ASPN Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 638.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while ASPN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ASPN's competition here
TT vs JELD Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 440.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while JELD trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JELD's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JELD's competition here
TT vs PPIH Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while PPIH trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PPIH's competition here
TT vs PHOE Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 177.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while PHOE trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 136.67. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PHOE's competition here
TT vs CSTE Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while CSTE trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSTE's competition here
TT vs APT Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while APT trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check APT's competition here
TT vs AIRJW Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while AIRJW trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AIRJW's competition here
TT vs AEHL Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while AEHL trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AEHL's competition here
TT vs ILAG Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while ILAG trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ILAG's competition here
TT vs VIEW Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VIEW's competition here
TT vs VIEWW Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VIEWW's competition here
TT vs AFI Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AFI's competition here
TT vs FRTA Comparison July 2025
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.3B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $472.07, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.89, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FRTA's competition here