Tata Motors Limited

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while TSLA trades at $316.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 188.13. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check TSLA's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 246B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while TM trades at $188.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check TM's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while RACE trades at $517.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 50.22. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check RACE's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GM trades at $53.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check GM's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F-PD trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check F-PD's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F-PB trades at $22.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check F-PB's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F-PC trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check F-PC's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, F has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while F trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check F's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LI trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check LI's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while STLA trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check STLA's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while XPEV trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -25.28. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check XPEV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while HMC trades at $33.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check HMC's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while RIVN trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check RIVN's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while NIO trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check NIO's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LCID trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check LCID's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VFS trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check VFS's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ZK trades at $29.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ZK's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PSNY trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check PSNY's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LOT trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check LOT's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while BLBD trades at $46.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check BLBD's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 857M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LVWR trades at $4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check LVWR's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while NAKD trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check NAKD's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VFSWW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check VFSWW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check PSNYW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while NIU trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check NIU's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFAI trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check FFAI's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check FFIEW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFIE trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check FFIE's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FLYE trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check FLYE's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check LOTWW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while CJET trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check CJET's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FSR trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check FSR's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while CENN trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check CENN's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while SOLO trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check SOLO's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while RIDE trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check RIDE's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while WKHS trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check WKHS's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while SVMH trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check SVMH's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ECDAW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GP trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check GP's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PEV trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check PEV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ECDA trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ECDA's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ARVL trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ARVL's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VLCN trades at $13.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check VLCN's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while MULN trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check MULN's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while AIEV trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check AIEV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GOEV trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check GOEV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while LOBO trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check LOBO's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while HYZN trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check HYZN's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while EVTV trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check EVTV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while FFAIW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check FFAIW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while DMN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check DMN's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while AYRO trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check AYRO's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while VEV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check VEV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ZAPP's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check GOEVW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while EGOX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check EGOX's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while SEV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check SEV's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check SOLOW's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ADOM trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ADOM's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while PTRA trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check PTRA's competition here

TTM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTM stands at 0. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTM is priced at $25.14, while ELMS trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTM's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TTM is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTM.Check ELMS's competition here